Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 9]

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Gumana Ram vs State Of Raj. & Ors on 4 January, 2010

Author: Prakash Tatia

Bench: Prakash Tatia

                             1




 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATAURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                   AT JODHPUR.

                           ORDER.


S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION    GUMANA RAM
NO.5777/2009                Vs. STATE OF RAJ. & ORS

S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION    GOPA RAM
NO.5778/2009                Vs. STATE OF RAJ. & ORS

S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION    PUSHPA CHOUDHARY
NO.5779/2009                Vs. STATE OF RAJ. & ORS

S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION    PARMENDAR KUMAR GODARA
NO.5780/2009                Vs. STATE OF RAJ. & ORS

S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION    OM PRAKASH MALI
NO.5781/2009                Vs. STATE OF RAJ. & ORS

S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION    HIMMAT KUMAR
NO.5782/2009                Vs. STATE OF RAJ. & ORS

S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION    MAGA RAM CHOUDHARY
NO.5783/2009                Vs. STATE OF RAJ. & ORS

S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION    BABU LAL
NO.5784/2009                Vs. STATE OF RAJ. & ORS

S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION    BAGTA RAM
NO.5785/2009                Vs. STATE OF RAJ. & ORS

S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION    OM PRAKASH
NO.5787/2009                Vs. STATE OF RAJ. & ORS.

S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION    SHOKAT KHAN
NO.5789/2009                Vs. STATE OF RAJ. & ORS

S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION    RAM LAL GODARA
NO.5791/2009                Vs. STATE OF RAJ. & ORS

S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION    RATANA RAM
NO.5792/2009                Vs. STATE OF RAJ. & ORS

S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION    LADHU RAM
NO.5793/2009                Vs. STATE OF RAJ. & ORS
                               2




S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION     UMA SHANKAR HUDA
NO.5794/2009                 Vs. STATE OF RAJ. & ORS

S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION     KISANA RAM
NO.5795/2009                 Vs. STATE OF RAJ. & ORS

S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION     NAINA RAM
NO.5796/2009                 Vs. STATE OF RAJ. & ORS

S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION     JEEVAN SINGH
NO.5797/2009                 Vs. STATE OF RAJ. & ORS

S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION     RAN SINGH RAO
NO.5798/2009                 Vs. STATE OF RAJ. & ORS

S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION     KISHORE RAM
NO.5799/2009                 Vs. STATE OF RAJ. & ORS.

S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION     MAHENDRA RAM
NO.5800/2009                 Vs. STATE OF RAJ. & ORS.

S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION     CHANDANA RAM SIYAG
NO.5801/2009                 Vs. STATE OF RAJ. & ORS

S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION     BHERA RAM
NO.5802/2009                 Vs. STATE OF RAJ. & ORS
                             BAJRANG SINGH DHARMAWAT &
S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION
                             ORS.
NO.5808/2009
                             Vs. STATE OF RAJ. & ORS
S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION     SMT. MOHNI
NO.6853/2009                 Vs. STATE OF RAJ. & ORS

S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION     DILIP KUMAR
NO.6854/2009                 Vs. STATE OF RAJ. & ORS

S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION     LEKH RAM
NO.6855/2009                 Vs. STATE OF RAJ. & ORS



     under Article 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India.


     Date of Order:                  January 04, 2010.

                           PRESENT
                               3




             HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J.

Servashri Shivnath Singh Rajpurohit, Rajesh Choudhary,
R.S. Choudhary, Sanjeev Johari, Hanuman Singh Choudhary
and J.D.Singh Bhati for the petitioners.

Mr.Yashpal Khileri for the respondents.


BY THE COURT:

The learned counsel for the parties submit that in the light of the decision of this Court delivered in S.B.Civil Writ Petition No. 1224/2009-Smt. Gandeep Kaur v. State of Raj. & ors. and other connected writ petition decided vide judgment dated 28.5.2009, these writ petition may also be disposed of.

The learned counsel for the parties submit that the petitioners may be allowed to submit their representation to the State.

Accordingly these writ petitions are also disposed of and it is ordered that the petitioners may submit their representation within a period of 15 days from today and the petitioners' representation will be considered by the 4 respondents and if the petitioners are found eligible for appointment in the light of the aforesaid decision, the respondents may pass appropriate order giving appointment to the petitioners on the post of GNM. The exercise may be completed within a period of two months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. It is made clear that the respondents shall keep in mind the observations made by this Court in the various judgments referred in the judgment dated 28.5.2009 as well as the observations made in the judgment dated 28.5.2009 itself.

( PRAKASH TATIA),J.

mlt.