Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Central Administrative Tribunal - Jammu

Sehdev Singh Bhau vs D/O Revenue on 23 December, 2025

                                                                :: 1 ::

                                     Central Administrative Tribunal
                                        Jammu Bench, Jammu

                                    Hearing through video conferencing

                                 Contempt Application No. 61/180/2024
                                             Arising out of
                                Transferred Application No. 61/635/2020

                                   This the 23rd day of December, 2025

                               Hon'ble Mr. Sanjeev Gupta, Judicial Member
                        Hon'ble Ms. Pragya Sahay Saksena, Administrative Member

                   1.     Sehdev Singh Bhau
                                                                          ...Petitioner
                   (Through Advocate: Mr. Arshad Majid Malik)

                                                 Versus

                   1.    Mr. Kumar Rajeev Ranjan (IAS), Commissioner-cum-Secretary
                         to Government, Revenue Department, Civil Secretariat,
                         Jammu/Srinagar and others
                                                                    ..Respondents
                   (Through Advocate: Mr. Hunar Gupta, D.A.G.)

       Digitally
ARUN signed by
KUMARARUN
       KUMAR
                                                                 :: 2 ::


                                              ORDER

(Per:- Pragya Sahay Saksena, Administrative Member) Fresh compliance report stands filed by the respondents, wherein it has been stated that the case of petitioner has been rejected vide speaking order dated 20.12.2025.

2. In view of the compliance report filed by the respondents, the Contempt Petition is closed. However, the petitioner shall be at liberty to avail appropriate remedy as available to him under law.

3. Rule of the Court stands discharged.

(Pragya Sahay Saksena) (Sanjeev Gupta) Administrative Member Judicial Member Arun...

Digitally ARUN signed by KUMARARUN KUMAR