Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal

Sical Logistics Ltd vs Commissioner Of Customs (Airport & ... on 4 July, 2013

        

 
CUSTOMS, EXCISE & SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
SOUTH ZONAL BENCH
CHENNAI

Appeal No. C/COD/312/11, C/S/714/11 & C/222/11

[Arising out of Order-in-Original No.685/2010 dt. 27.12.2010 passed by the Commissioner of Customs (Airport & Aircargo) Chennai] 

For approval and signature :

Honble Shri P.K. Das, Judicial Member
Honble Shri Mathew John, Technical Member


1. Whether Press Reporters may be allowed to see the Order for publication as per  Rule 27 of the CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982?	                         						:

2. Whether it should be released under Rule 27 of the CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982 for publication in any authoritative report or not ?	             							:

   3. Whether the Members wish to see the fair copy of 
	the order?  								:    

4. Whether Order is to be circulated to the Departmental authorities ?										:


Sical Logistics Ltd.						Appellant

         Versus

Commissioner of Customs (Airport & Aircargo)
Chennai							Respondent

Appearance:

None		                                   For the Appellant

Shri K.S.V.V. Prasad, JC (AR)         For the Respondent

CORAM :

Honble Shri P.K. Das, Judicial Member
Honble Shri Mathew John, Technical Member

					                       Date of Hearing :   4-7-2013
    Date of Decision  :  4-7-2013



FINAL ORDER No.___________


Per P.K. Das



Applicant filed this application for condonation of delay of 79 days in filing the appeal. None appears on behalf of the applicant. There is no adjournment application on record. Ld. AR for Revenue submits that this matter was adjourned earlier at the request of learned advocate. It seems that applicant is not interested to proceed in the matter. Accordingly, the COD application is dismissed. Consequently, the appeal along with stay application are dismissed.

(Dictated and pronounced in open court)




       (MATHEW  JOHN)                                                           (P.K.DAS)        
   TECHNICAL MEMBER                                                JUDICIAL MEMBER


  gs
2