Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Biotor Industries Ltd. Thro' Rajesh M. ... vs State Of Gujarat on 22 June, 2018

Author: J.B. Pardiwala

Bench: J.B.Pardiwala

        R/CR.MA/23822/2015                                                    IA ORDER




            IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD


               CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 1 of 2016
                                 IN
            R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 23822 of 2015
==========================================================

NARENDRA YESHWANT UTTARWAR & 16... Petitioners Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & 5... Respondents ========================================================== Appearance:

MR HARDIK A DAVE for the PETITIONER(s) No. MS MOXA THAKKAR, AP for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1 MR RC KODEKAR, ADVOCATE for the Respondent No.2 ========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA Date : 22/06/2018 IA ORDER 1 By this application, the applicants - original accused have prayed  for the following reliefs:
"15A. This Hon'ble Court be pleased to admit this application.
B. This Hon'ble Court may be please to re­call the order dated 15 th  December   2015   passed   in   Criminal   Misc.   Application   (for   transfer)   No.23822 of 2015 and restore the matter to its original file in the interest   of justice. 
C. Pending application and final hearing of this application stay the   further proceedings of CBI Special Case No.1 of 2016 pending before ld.   Special Judge, CBI Court No.5, Mirzapur, Ahmedabad.


       D.      To   pass   such   other   and   further   orders   as   are   necessary   in   the 


                                          Page 1 of 3
        R/CR.MA/23822/2015                                                      IA ORDER




      interest of justice."


2     The Criminal Miscellaneous Application (for transfer) No.23822 of 
2015 came to be disposed of by this Court dated 15th December 2015 in  the following terms:
"Rule   returnable   forthwith.   Mr.   Shah,   the   learned   Additional  Public   Prosecutor   wavies   service   of   notice   of   rule   for   and   on   behalf   of   the   respondent State of Gujarat. Mr. R.C. Kodekar, the learned counsel enters   appearance for the respondent CBI and waives service of notice of rule for   and on behalf of the respondent CBI.
By this application under Section 482 read with 407(2) of the Code of   Criminal Procedure, 1973, the applicants original accused Nos.1, 2 and 3,   have prayed for the following reliefs:­ A) Admit and allow the present application.
B) To transfer the CBI Case No.5 of 2015 arising out of RC 3(E) of   2011 dated 30.1.2011 pending with CBI Court No.2, Ahmedabad,   Mirzapur   Court   to   Ld.   Special   Court,   CBI   Court   No.7,   at   Ahmedabad City Sessions Court, Mirzapur, Ahmedabad C) Pending the hearing and final disposal of the present application   this Honble Court may be pleased to stay the proceedings in respect   of framing of charges pending in CBI Case No.5 of 2015 arising out   RC 3(E) of 2011 dated 30.1.2011 pending with CBI Court No.2,   Ahmedabad, Mirzapur Court, Ahmedabad.
D)   Pending   the   hearing   and   final   disposal   of   the   present   application   this   Honble   Court   may   be   pleased   to   stay   the   proceedings in respect of framing of charges pending in Special CBI  Case No. 1 of 2015 arising out of RC 1(E)/2011, Special CBI Case   No.   10   of  2013   arising   out   of  RC  6(E)/2011,  Special   CBI  Case   No.4   of   2013   arising   out   of   RC7(E)/2011,   CBI   Case   No.   28   of   2015 arising out of RC 7(E) of 2012 and Special Case Nos. 23 to   26 of 2015, pending with the ld. Special Court, CBI Court No.7 at   Ahmedabad City Sessions Court, Mirzapur, Ahmedabad.
E) This Honble Court may be pleased to pass any such other and   further   and   proper   order   which   may   deem   fit   to   impose   in   the   circumstances of the present case.

Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and having   Page 2 of 3 R/CR.MA/23822/2015 IA ORDER through the materials on record, more particularly, the order passed by   this Court dated 10.12.2014 in  the Criminal Miscellaneous Application   No.1796 of 2014 (Page: 314), this application is allowed.

Taking into consideration the fact that all cases are interrelated, although   the   separate   charge­sheets   might   have   been   filed,   yet   taking   into   consideration the order passed by this Court referred to above as well as   the Coordinate Bench, the CBI Case No.5 of 2015 arising out of RC 3(E) of   2011   pending   with   the   CBI   Court   No.2,   Ahmedabad,   as   on   today,   is   ordered to be transferred to the Special Judge for CBI Cases, CBI Court   No.7, at Ahmedabad Sessions Court, Mirzapur. Rule is made absolute to   the aforesaid extent. Direct service is permitted."

3 Thus, it appears that all the cases were ordered to be transferred  to one particular Court i.e. the Court of the learned Special Judge, C.B.I.  at Mirzapur. The prayer in this application is that the order passed by  this Court dated 15th December 2015 be recalled since the 17 applicants  herein are charged with the offences which are magistrate triable and  they should not be put on trial in the Court of the Special Judge, C.B.I.  As all the cases are interrelated and in some of the cases, the prosecution  is for the offence punishable under the provisions of the Prevention of  Corruption   Act,   this   Court   thought   fit   to   assign   all   the   cases   to   one  particular Court. In such circumstances, I see no good reason to recall  the order passed by this Court dated 15th  December 2015 in Criminal  Miscellaneous   Application   (for   transfer)   No.23822   of   2015.   This  application   is,   accordingly,   rejected.   Notice   stands   discharged.   Ad­ interim relief earlier granted stands vacated.

4 The   case   shall   now   proceed   further   in   accordance   with   law   at   the  earliest.

(J.B. PARDIWALA, J.) CHANDRESH Page 3 of 3