Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 1]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Ranjana Agnihotri vs Union Of India on 28 June, 2021

Bench: Chief Justice, A.S. Bopanna, Hrishikesh Roy

     ITEM NO.3                Court 1 (Video Conferencing)                 SECTION PIL-W

                               S U P R E M E C O U R T O F           I N D I A
                                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

                              Writ Petition(s)(Civil) No(s).639/2020

     RANJANA AGNIHOTRI & ORS.                                             Petitioner(s)

                                                   VERSUS

     UNION OF INDIA & ORS.                                                Respondent(s)

     (FOR ADMISSION and IA No.59785/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT
     and IA No.59781/2020-APPLICATION FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING ORIGINAL
     VAKALATNAMA/OTHER DOCUMENT)

     Date : 28-06-2021 This petition was called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :
                         HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
                         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA
                         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY

     For Petitioner(s)             Mr.    Vikas Singh, Sr.Adv.
                                   Mr.    Hari Shankar Jain, Adv.
                                   Mr.    Vishnu Shankar Jain, AOR
                                   Mr.    Pankaj Kumar Verma, Adv.

     For Respondent(s)             Mr.    Anil Grover, Sr.AAG, State of Haryana
                                   Mr.    Rahul Khurana, Adv.
                                   Mr.    Satish Kumar, Adv.
                                   Mr.    Sanjay Kumar Visen, Adv.

                         UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                            O R D E R

The Court is convened through Video Conferencing. Having heard learned senior counsel for the petitioners and carefully perusing the material placed on record, we are not inclined to entertain this petition under Article 32 of the Constitution.

The Writ Petition is, accordingly, dismissed. As a sequel to the above, pending interlocutory applications also stand disposed of.

Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by SATISH KUMAR YADAV Date: 2021.06.28 16:40:07 IST Reason:

(SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (R.S. NARAYANAN) DEPUTY REGISTRAR COURT MASTER (NSH)