Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Gurinder Singh vs Union Of India on 31 August, 2024

Author: Anil Kshetarpal

Bench: Anil Kshetarpal

                               Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:113057-DB




CWP-PIL-179--2024                                                          -1-

           IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
                        AT CHANDIGARH


                                                             CWP-PIL-179-2024
                                                                         2024
                                                    Date of decision : 31.08.2024
                                                                             2024

Gurinder Singh and another
                                                                 .......Petitioners
                                                                 .......Petitioner
                                   Versus
Union of India and others
                                                                .......Respondents


CORAM:      HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHEEL NAGU
                                      NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE
            HON'BLE MR.
                    MR JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL


Present:      Mr. Deepinder Singh Virk, Advocate,
              Mr. Imaan Singh Khara, Advocate,
              Mr. K.S. Sidhu, Advocate,
              Mr. G.S. Salana, Advocate, and
              Mr. J.S. Salana, Advocate,
              for the petitioners.

              Mr. Satya Pal Jain, Addl. Solicitor General of India, with
              Mr. Dheeraj Jain, Senior Panel Counsel, UOI,
              for respondents No.1 and 2.

              Mr. Saurav Khurana, Addl. Advocate General, Punjab.

                            ****

SHEEL NAGU, NA CHIEF JUSTICE ( Oral )

1. This is petition has been filed as a Public Interest Litigation (PIL), wherein the alleged public cause raised is that movie, named "Emergency", which is scheduled to be released on 06.09.2024, contains scenes which target and hurt the sentiments of Sikh community and, therefore, prayer in this petition is made to the following effect :

"
"(i) Issue a writ in nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, directing the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 to call for all the records and documents of 1 of 5 ::: Downloaded on - 03-09-2024 04:10:26 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:113057-DB CWP-PIL-179--2024 -2- the Examination Committee as well as the Review Committee in respect of the "Emergency" Movie and to cancel/revoke /revoke the certificate issued to the said film for release in public domain, in the interest of justice, equity and fair pla play.
(ii) With a further prayer for issuance of a writ in nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, directing the respondents no.1 and 2 to expunge/ delete the scenes targeting Sikh Community, whereby through projection of false and erroneous facts an attempt has been made to destroy the social fabric of State of Punjab, from the film "Emergency" which is scheduled to be release released on 06.09.2024, in the interest of justice, equity and fair play.
(iii) With a further prayer for appointing special panel, including respondent no.5 and other Eminent Sikh Personalities, monitored by this Hon'ble High Court to review the said "Emergency" film and the grant of certificate by the respondent no.2 before permitting tting the exhibition, circulation and viewership of the said film for public viewing, in the interest of justice, equity and fair play.
(iv) With a further prayer for issuance of a writ in nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, directing official respondent no.1 to restraint respondent nos. 12 to 14 and any other such similar social media/OTT Platforms, from in any manner exhibiting, circulating or making available for viewership ip to the General Public the said film and its trailer, namely "Emergency", in the interest of justice, equity and fair play.
(iv) With a further prayer for issuance of a writ in nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ,

2 of 5 ::: Downloaded on - 03-09-2024 04:10:27 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:113057-DB CWP-PIL-179--2024 -3- directing official responde respondent no.4 to set the criminal law into motion and register an FIR, under the relevant provisions of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (B.N.S.), Cinematograph Act 1952 and other relevant legislatures, against respondent nos. 6 to 11 and other delinquent persons aassociated with the said "Emergency" film, whereby an attempt is being made to tarnish the image of Sikh Community and to destroy the social fabric of Punjab State, in the interest of justice, equity and fair play.

(vi) With a further prayer for issuance of a writ in nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, directing the official respondent no.3 to exercise powers under section 98 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (B.N.S.S.) to forfeit the said film and take necessary action to cease all rrecords of the said film from respondent no.2 and respondent nos. 6 to 11 to avoid any exhibition, circulation and viewership of the said film and/or its trailer namely "Emergency", in the State of Punjab, in the interest of justice, equity and fair play.

(

(vii) With a further prayer for issuance of a writ in nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, directing the respondent nos. 1 and 2 to suspend the certification on for release of the said film "Emergency" and to stay/injunct the release of the said film ilm in the entire country during the pendency of the present writ petition, in the interest of justice, equity and fair play.

(viii) With a further prayer for issuance of a writ in nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, directing respondent nos. 1 to 4 to decide the representations of the present petitioners in a time 3 of 5 ::: Downloaded on - 03-09-2024 04:10:27 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:113057-DB CWP-PIL-179--2024 -4- bound manner, in the interest of justice, equity and fair play."

2. Learned Additional Solicitor General of India, appearing on behalf of the Union of India (respondent No.1) and the Central Board of Film Certification (respondent (res No.2), informs the Court that certification of the film, as contemplated under Rule 23 of the Cinematograph (Certification) Rules, 1983, framed under the Cinematograph Act, 1952, has not yet taken place.

3. Learned Additional Solicitor General of India has further assured that all the necessary precautions, that are enshrined in the Cinematograph Act, 1952 and the Rules of 1983, including guiding principles for certifying films, films i.e. interest of the sovereignty ereignty and integrity of India, security of the State, friendly relations with foreign States, public order, decency or morality, defamation or contempt of court etc.,, shall be taken into account.

4. It is also assured by learned Additional Solicitor G General eneral of India that the guiding principles laid down in the notification dated 06.12.1991 (Annexure P-7) P 7) shall be kept in mind by respondent No.2 Board which shall take care, that contents of the said movie do not hurt the sentiments of any community, including inc Sikh community.

5. Be that as it may, this Court also finds that even after certification of the movie being made, any aggrieved person has remedy to approach respondent No.2 Board to place the matter before the Revising Committee for review of certification certification issued by the Board, which is to be dealt with in accordance with Rule 24 of the Cinematograph (Certification) Rules, 1983.

4 of 5 ::: Downloaded on - 03-09-2024 04:10:27 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:113057-DB CWP-PIL-179--2024 -5-

6. In view of aforesaid assurance given by learned Additional Solicitor General of India on behalf of respondents No.1 aand nd 2, and availability of alternative remedy, this Court deems it appropriate not to issue notice in this case and leave it to the petitioners to avail the remedies under the Cinematograph Act, 1952 and the Cinematograph (Certification) Rules, 1983.

7. This Court has no manner of doubt doubt,, that the assurance given by learned Additional Solicitor General of India shall not be breached by respondent No.2 Board.

8. Petition stands disposed of accordingly.

( SHEEL NAGU ) CHIEF JUSTICE ( ANIL KSHETARPAL ) JUDGE August 31,, 2024 ndj Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No 5 of 5 ::: Downloaded on - 03-09-2024 04:10:27 :::