Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 42]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Union Of India vs M. Siddaraj on 25 March, 2022

Author: J.K. Maheshwari

Bench: J.K. Maheshwari

                                                    1

      ITEM NO.1714                 Court 9 (Video Conferencing)        SECTION IV-A
                                 S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
                                         RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

                Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)        No(s).    4722/2021

      UNION OF INDIA & ANR.                                              Petitioner(s)

                                                   VERSUS

      M. SIDDARAJ                                                        Respondent(s)

      (OFFICE             REPORT FOR DIRECTION
       IA No.             155624/2021 - APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION
       IA No.             130647/2021 - APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS
       IA No.             130658/2021 - APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS
       IA No.             96460/2021 - INTERVENTION APPLICATION
       IA No.             77264/2021 - INTERVENTION APPLICATION
       IA No.             168502/2021 - INTERVENTION APPLICATION
       IA No.             123704/2021 - INTERVENTION APPLICATION
       IA No.             123603/2021 - INTERVENTION APPLICATION
       IA No.             122419/2021 - INTERVENTION APPLICATION
       IA No.             98915/2021 - INTERVENTION APPLICATION
       IA No.             130642/2021 - INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT
       IA No.             126159/2021 - INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT
       IA No.             132377/2021 - INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT
       IA No.             130653/2021 - INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT
       IA No.             126161/2021 - PERMISSION TO APPEAR AND ARGUE IN PERSON)

      Date : 25-03-2022 These matters were called on for hearing today.

      CORAM :              HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.K. MAHESHWARI
                                            [IN CHAMBER]

      For Petitioner(s)              Mr. Rajeev Kumar Srivastava, Adv.
                                     Mr. Amrish Kumar, AOR

      For Respondent(s)              Mr. Anand Sanjay M. Nuli, Adv.
                                     Ms. Akhila Wali, Adv.
                                     For M/S. Nuli & Nuli, AOR

                                     Ms. Shirin Khajuria, AOR

                                     Mr. Rajat Joseph, AOR

                                     Mr.   Anubhav, Adv.
Signature Not Verified
                                     Mr.   Yashwant Singh Yadav, Adv.
                                     Ms.   Preeti Yadav, Adv.
Digitally signed by Dr.
Mukesh Nasa
Date: 2022.03.29
12:34:27 IST
Reason:                              Mr.   Vijay Kumar, Adv.
                                     Mr.   Ravi Karhana, aDv.
                                     Mr.   Rajesh Kumar, Adv.
                                     Mr.   Amit Kumar, Adv.
                                     Mr.   Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, AOR
                                    2


                    Applicant-in-person, AOR

                    Mr.    Vidya Sagar, Adv.
                    Ms.    Bano Deswal, Adv.
                    Mr.    Vedant Pardhan, Adv.
                    Mr.    Rajendra Beniwal, Adv.
                    Mr.    Ashutosh Kumar, Adv.
                    Ms.    Sweta Sharma, Adv.
                    Mr.    R. C. Kaushik, AOR

                    Mr. Venkita Subramoniam T.R., AOR

                    Ms. Geeta Luthra, Sr. Adv.

          UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                             O R D E R

IA No. 96460/2021, IA No. 77264/2021, IA No. 168502/2021, IA No. 123704/2021, IA No. 123603/2021, IA No. 122419/2021, IA No. 98915/2021, IA No. 130642/2021, IA No. 126159/2021, IA No. 132377/2021, IA No. 130653/2021:

These applications have been filed seeking intervention or impleadment in the case.
The present case is arising out of an order passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, however, whether they are necessary party or not or they may be affected by any adverse order passed, it may be decided by the Bench dealing with the matter on merits. Therefore, the hearing on these applications is deferred. All these applications be placed before the Bench hearing the case on merits.
The other remaining applications shall also be placed before the same Bench. The Registry is requested to list the case before an appropriate Bench.
     (NEHA GUPTA)                                      (RENU KALIA)
SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT                             BRANCH OFFICER