Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Delhi High Court

Mr Ajay & Ors vs State Of Nct Of Delhi & Anr on 4 July, 2025

                          $~49
                          *    IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

                          %                                          Date of decision: 04.07.2025
                          ,,,,,,,,,,




                          +            CRL.M.C. 2029/2025

                                       MR AJAY & ORS.                              .....Petitioners
                                                     Through:        Petitioners in person with Mr.
                                                                     Harinder Choudhary, Advocate
                                                     versus
                                       STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.          ... Respondents
                                                     Through: Mr. Raghuvinder Verma, APP
                                                               for the State/R-1
                                                               Inspector Rambir Sharma, East
                                                               District
                                                               Respondent No. 2 is present in
                                                               person with Mr. Akshay Lodhi
                                                               &      Ms.     Simran   Singh,
                                                               Advocates


                          CORAM:-
                          HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA
                                                  JUDGMENT(ORAL)

RAVINDER DUDEJA, J.

1. This is a petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking quashing of FIR No. 0453/2016, registered at P.S Mayur Vihar Ph-1 under sections 498A/377/406/34 IPC and all proceedings emanating therefrom on the basis of settlement between the parties.

2. The marriage between Petitioner No.1 and Respondent No.2 was solemnized on 29.11.2012 as per Hindu rites and ceremonies at Delhi. No child was born out of the said wedlock. It is submitted that due to temperamental differences, the couple started living separately since 01.05.2016. Thereafter, Respondent No.2 filed a petition under section 12 of DV Act and also lodged the aforesaid complaint case against Petitioner No.1 and his family members.

3. During the proceedings, the parties amicably resolved their disputes and executed a Settlement Deed dated 12.07.2024. In pursuance of the Settlement, the parties jointly filed a fresh petition for divorce by mutual consent under Section 13B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The learned Family Court, Karkardooma Courts allowed the mutual divorce petition on 16.09.2022, thereby dissolving the marriage between the Petitioner No.1 and Respondent No.2. It is submitted that all the previous complaints and litigations initiated by the parties has been withdrawn and all conditions of the Settlement Agreement have been fulfilled including the payment of the total settlement amount of Rs. 14,50,000/- (Rupees fourteen lacs fifty thousand) as per the schedule mentioned in the Settlement Deed. The copy of Settlement Deed dated 12.07.2024 has been placed on record as Annexure P-3.

4. All the petitioners as well as respondent No. 2 are physically - present before the Court. They have been identified by their respective counsels as well as by the Investigating Officer Inspector Rambir Sharma from East District.

5. Respondent No.2 confirms that the matter has been settled with the petitioners without any force, fear, coercion and she has received the payment of the entire settlement amount of Rs. 14,50,000/- (Rupees fourteen lacs fifty thousand) from the Petitioners as per the Settlement Deed. She further submits that she has no objection if the FIR No. 0453/2016 is quashed against the petitioners.

6. In view of the settlement between the parties, learned Additional PP appearing for the State, also has no objection if the present FIR No. 0453/2016 is quashed.

7. In Gian Singh vs State of Punjab (2012) 10 SCC 303, Hon'ble Supreme Court has recognized the need of amicable resolution of disputes by observing as under:-

"61. In other words, the High Court must consider whether it would be unfair or contrary to the interest of justice to continue with the criminal proceedings or continuation of criminal proceedings would tantamount to abuse of process of law despite settlement and compromise between the victim and the wrongdoer and whether to secure the ends of justice, it is appropriate that criminal case is put to an end and if the answer to the above question(s) is in the CRL.M.C. 2029/2025 Page 3 of 4 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:VAISHALI PRUTHI Signing Date:05.07.2025 12:07:12 affirmative, the High Court shall be well within its jurisdiction to quash the criminal proceedings."

8. In view of the aforesaid circumstances and the fact that parties have put a quietus to the dispute, no useful purpose will be served in continuing with the present FIR No. 0453/2016, registered at P.S Mayur Vihar Ph-1 under sections 498A/377/406/34 IPC and all the other consequential proceeding emanating therefrom.

9. In the interest of justice, the petition is allowed, and the FIR No. 0453/2016, registered at P.S Mayur Vihar Ph-1 under sections 498A/377/406/34 IPC and all the other consequential proceeding emanating therefrom is hereby quashed.

10. Petition is allowed and disposed of accordingly.

11. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.

RAVINDER DUDEJA, J JULY 04, 2025 AK CRL.M.C. 2029/2025 Page 4 of 4 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:VAISHALI PRUTHI Signing Date:05.07.2025 12:07:12