Madras High Court
M.Gaspar Raj vs The District Collector on 2 April, 2019
Author: G.R.Swaminathan
Bench: G.R.Swaminathan
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 02.04.2019
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN
W.P.(MD)No.7750 of 2019
M.Gaspar Raj ... Petitioner
Vs
1.The District Collector,
Thoothukudi,
Thoothukudi District.
2.The District Revenue Officer,
Thoothukudi,
Thoothukudi District.
3.The Special Tahsildar,
Town Settlement Officer,
Kovilpatti,
Kovilpatti Taluk,
Thoothukudi District.
4.The Special Tahsildar,
Land Acquisition,
Railway Double Track Project,
Kovilpatti,
Campus of Head Quarters Tahsildar,
Kovilpatti, Thoothukudi District. ... Respondents
PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the
records relating to the impugned order passed by the third
respondent in m1/D7/S.No.479/2B1 dated 07.03.2019 and quash
the same and to direct the third respondent to issue patta in the
http://www.judis.nic.in
2
petitioner's name for the 1.75 cents of house site in Survey No.
479/2B1 situated in Ilupaaiurani Village in Kovilpatti, Thoothukudi
District and to consequently direct the fourth respondent to serve
in the petitioner's name a show cause notice under Section 3(2) of
the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act,
1997 for the 1.75 cents of house site in Survey No.479/2B1 situated
in Iluppaiurani Village in Kovilpatti, Thoothukudi District.
For Petitioner : Mr.V.Santhakumaresan
For Respondents : Mr.M.Karuppasamy
Government Advocate
ORDER
The writ petitioner questions the letter dated 07.03.2019 sent by the third respondent to the fourth respondent. In the said letter, the third respondent has sought certain details from the fourth respondent. This communication by itself does not in any way affect the rights of the petitioner. Since the main prayer made in this writ petition is for quashing the said communication, I am of the view that the writ petition itself is not maintainable. However, the petitioner is at liberty to file an independent writ petition seeking issuance of patta. The writ petitioner's rights have not been adjudicated in this writ petition.
http://www.judis.nic.in 3
2. Leaving open the rights of the writ petitioner, the Writ Petition stands dismissed. No costs.
02.04.2019
Index : Yes/No
Internet : Yes/No
rmk
To
1.The District Collector, Thoothukudi, Thoothukudi District.
2.The District Revenue Officer, Thoothukudi, Thoothukudi District.
3.The Special Tahsildar, Town Settlement Officer, Kovilpatti, Kovilpatti Taluk, Thoothukudi District.
4.The Special Tahsildar, Land Acquisition, Railway Double Track Project, Kovilpatti, Campus of Head Quarters Tahsildar, Kovilpatti, Thoothukudi District.
http://www.judis.nic.in 4 G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.
rmk W.P.(MD)No.7750 of 2019 02.04.2019 http://www.judis.nic.in