Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Assam Roller Flour Mills Association vs The State Of Assam on 18 August, 2015

     ITEM NO.108                              REGISTRAR COURT. 1                         SECTION XIV

                                      S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
                                              RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
                                      BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MRS. RACHNA GUPTA

     Civil Appeal                   No(s).    9655/2013

     ASSAM ROLLER FLOUR MILLS ASSOCIATION                                             Appellant(s)

                                                           VERSUS

     STATE OF ASSAM & ORS.                                                            Respondent(s)
     (with interim relief and office report)
     WITH
     C.A. No. 9656/2013
     (With C.A. No. 9657-9665/2013
     (With Office Report)
     C.A. No. 9666/2013
     (With Office Report)

     Date : 18/08/2015 This appeal was called on for hearing today.

     For Appellant(s)
                                              Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra,Adv.
                                              Mr. Anupam Lal Das,Adv.

     For Respondent(s)
                                             Mr.    Karma Dorjee, Adv.
                                             Mr.    Anupam Lal Das,Adv.
                                             Ms.    Vartika Sahay, Adv.
                                             M/s    Corporate Law Group,Adv.
                                             Mr.    Kunal Chatterji, Adv.
                                             Mr.    Sunil Murarka, Adv.

                                 UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                                    O R D E R

Service upon both the respondents in C.A. No.9659, 9662, 9663 and 9665/2013 is complete but none has entered appearance.

These appeals stand complete, however, to be listed before the Hon'ble Court alongwith the connected appeals. Signature Not Verified

Service among both the respondents in C.A. Nos.9657, Digitally signed by Rupam Dhamija Date: 2015.08.22 9658, 9660, 9661/2013 is complete.

11:02:51 IST
Reason:                                                            Respondent No.1 in these

appeals is only represented and respondent No.2 has chosen to not to appear, despite being served. These appeals stand also Item No.108 -2- complete, however, to be listed before the Hon'ble Court alongwith the connected appeals.

In C.A. No.9655/2013, among four respondents herein, service of notice of lodgement of petition of appeal is complete and all the four respondents are duly represented. In C.A. No.9656/2013, among nine respondents herein, though the service of notice of lodgement of petition of appeal upon all these respondents is complete still only respondent Nos.2 and 4 have been represented. No other respondent has entered appearance. However, today the Ld. Advocate, Mr. Ishan Das, appearing on behalf of Mr. Hrishikesh Baruah, Advocate-on-Record has appeared for respondent No.1. Vakalatnama be filed within three weeks. In C.A. No.9666/2013, among 12 respondents herein, respondent Nos.1 to 3 are duly represented. Respondent Nos.4 to 7 and 9 to 11 are also being duly served. However, none has entered appearance on their behalf. Respondent No.8 is yet to be served. Appellant to provide the complete and correct address of respondent No.8. Fresh notice thereafter be issued.

Appellant to provide the complete set of the pleadings upon the respondents, who have entered appearance. List again on 27.10.2015.

(RACHNA GUPTA) Registrar