Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

Hari Kannan vs K.Jamuna Rani on 4 October, 2016

Author: D.Krishnakumar

Bench: D.Krishnakumar

        

 

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT               

DATED:  04.10.2016  

CORAM   
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR             

C.R.P(PD)(MD)No.2027 of 2016   

Hari Kannan                     .. Petitioner/Petitioner/Plaintiff

                                        vs.

K.Jamuna Rani                   .. Respondent/Respondent/Defendant  

Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution
of India, praying this Court to direct the Subordinate Judge, Melur(Camp
Court) to dispose of  E.P.No.194 of 2015 in O.S.No.159 of 2011 and to pass
appropriate orders on merits within the time frame fixed by this Court.

!For Petitioner    : M/s.M.Ponniah
^For Respondent : 

:ORDER  

This revision has been filed seeking for a direction to direct the Sub- ordinate Judge, Melur(Camp Court) to dispose of E.P.No.194 of 2015 in O.S.No.159 of 2011 and to pass appropriate orders on merits within the time frame fixed by this Court.

2.According to the Petitioner that the Petitioner as plaintiff, has filed a suit in O.S.No.159 of 2011 against the respondent herein for ejectment, recovery of arrears of rent amount, damages and for other reliefs. The aforesaid suit was decreed on 09.06.2015 and two months time was granted by the trial Court to vacate and hand over the vacant possession of the disputed premises to the Petitioner herein. Thereafter, the respondent herein has not complied with the order of the trial Court. Hence the Petitioner has filed an execution petition in E.P.No.195 of 2015, for delivery of possession. In the aforesaid E.P, notice has been ordered to the respondent and the same has been adjourned on various dates, which reads as under:

SL.No. Date of Hearing Stage of the case 1 11.08.2016 Notice to respondent by 16.09.2016 2 16.09.2016 Notice served Mr.R.Muthumani files Vakalath-counter by 20.11.2015 3 20.11.2015 Counter by- on petition time extended till 20.01.2016(NFA) 4 20.01.2016 Counter NFA. Counter filed ? Petitioner side enquiry heard ? Exhibit P1 and P2 marked ? respondent side enquiry by 29.01.2016(L.C) 5 29.01.2016 Respondent side enquiry(L.C) ? On petition filed by respondent call on 5.2.2016(NFA) 6 5.2.2016 Adjournment petition filed and partly allowed -petition under Order 21 Rule 26 is filed C & C on 09.02.2016 7 09.02.2016 Under Order 21 Rule 26 petition filed check and found correct ? E.A.No.2 of 2016 -Stay petition pending call on 19.02.2016 8 19.02.2016 E.A.No.2 of 2016 -Stay petition pending call on 30.3.2016 9 30.03.2016 E.A.No.2 of 2016 -Stay petition pending call on 06.04.2016 10 06.04.2016 E.A.No.2 of 2016 -Stay petition pending call on 22.04.2016 11 22.4.2016 Local Holiday 12 27.4.2016 E.A.No.2 of 2016 -Stay petition pending call on 14.06.2016 13 10.06.2016 E.A.No.2 of 2016 -Stay petition pending call on 14.06.2016 14 14.06.2016 E.A.No.2 of 2016 -Stay petition pending call on 17.06.2016 15 17.06.2016 E.A.No.2 of 2016 -Stay petition pending call on 22.06.2016 16 22.06.2016 Respondent side enquiry NFA. E.A.No.2 of 2016 pending ? dismissed ?

respondent side enquiry by 29.6.2016(NFA) 17 29.6.2016 Respondent side enquiry NFA ? No representation for the Petitioner ? respondent appeared in person ? filed a memo ? Call on 12.07.2016 18 12.07.2016 Memo filed ? Checked -returned ? respondent side enquiry NFA ? No representation for both party ? Call on 16.09.2016(NFA) 19 16.09.2016 Respondent side enquiry call on 21.09.2016

3.In-spite of that, the respondent has not chosen to file her counter affidavit and therefore, it is appropriate for this Court to consider the limited prayer sought for by the Petitioner to dispose of the aforesaid E.P.No.194 of 2015 in O.S.No.159 of 2011.

4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court is inclined to pass the following order:

If there is no other impediment in disposing the above said execution petition, the Sub-Court(Camp Court), Melur is directed to dispose of the E.P.No.194 of 2015 in O.S.No.159 of 2011 on merits and in accordance with law, after providing opportunity of hearing to the respondent, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of four months, from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

5.With the above direction, this Civil Revision Petition is disposed of. No costs.

To The Sub-Judge(Camp Court), Melur..