Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati

Sri Lanka Surya Subrahmanyam, vs State Of Andhra Pradesh, on 27 July, 2021

Author: M.Satyanarayana Murthy

Bench: M.Satyanarayana Murthy

  
  

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JULY,
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE. &
XS

Be

> PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY '

WRIT PETITION NO: 10799 OF 2021 va
Between:

Sri Lanka Surya Subrahmanyam, S/o late Lanka Suryanarayana, Age 79 years, residing

at Venkatapuram Village (alias Kamandoravalasa Village), Seethanagaram Mandal,
VizianagaramDistrict (Aadhar No 3544 70556924).

' Petitioner

AND

1. State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Revenue
Department, Secretariat Nelapadu, Guntur District.
District Collector, Vizianagaram District
Tahsildar, Seethanagaram Mandal-535546, Vizianagaram District.
- ,..Respondents

wn

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to
issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ
of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents particularly the Respondent No.3
herein in high-handed manner attempting to dispossess/evict the Petitioner herein from
the land situated in an extent of Ac.4-10 Cents in S.No 15/2, situated at
Kamandoravalasa Village, Seethanagaram Mandal, Vizianagaram District without
issuing any notice, without conducting any enquiry and without having any right and title
over the property as illegal, arbitrary, unjust, mala fide, against to the fundamental rights
guaranteed to the petitioner under the constitution particular Article 14 and 300A of
Constitution of India, apart from violation of principles of natural justice and against to
the settled principles of Jaw and to consequently direct the Respondents not to interfere
with possession and enjoyment of the petitioner property to an extent of Ac.4-10 Cenis
inS.No 15/2, situated at Kamandoravalasa Village, Seethanagaram Mandal,
Vizianagaram District,without following due process of law.

IA NO: 1 OF 2021

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the
affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass ad-
interim direction directing the Respondents herein not to interfere with the Petitioner's
property to an extent of Ac.4-10 Cents in S.No:15/2, situated at Venkatapuram Village
(alias Kamandoravalasa Village), Seethanagaram Mandal, Vizianagaram District,
including demolishing of Petitioner's Residential house, pending disposal of
WP No.10199 of 2021, on the file of the High Court..

The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petition and affidavit filed
herein and Orders of High Court dated 18-05-2021 & 29-06-2021 made herein and
upon hearing the arguments of M/s. Ravi Cheemalapati, Advocate for the Petitioner, GP
for Revenue for Respondents, the Court made the following _-

  
  
 

_ DORR anda TEAS Warn ont pinyin Cat Suna TUR TI ka eg Brewis Sat teenie Ege ARRAN ee yee roe at tent niente Tt

ORDER:

Interim Order granted earlier by this Court is extended for a period of eight (8) weeks, di-P.Vined Kumar" | ASSISTANT REGISTRAR TRUE COPY! secTiON OFFICER Post after six (6) weeks. To,

1. One CC to M/s. Ravi Cheemalapati, Advocate [OPUC] Zz. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT]

3. One spare copy Skm HIGH COURT MSM,J DATED: 27-07-2021 NOTE: POST AFTER SIX WEEKS ORDER WP.No.10199 of 2021 EXTENSION OF INTERIM ORDER