Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Vinod Kumar vs State Of Rajasthan on 13 August, 2021

Author: Vijay Bishnoi

Bench: Vijay Bishnoi

     HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                      JODHPUR
                 S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8982/2021

1.     Vinod Kumar S/o Shri Ram Kumar, Aged About 22 Years,
       By Caste Brahmin, R/o Chak 4 Rtp, Ratanupra, Tehsil
       Sangaria, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).
2.     Roop Singh S/o Shri Pahara Singh, Aged About 61 Years,
       By Caste Jat Sikh, R/o Chak 4 Rtp, Ratanupra, Tehsil
       Sangaria, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).
3.     Ramu Ram S/o Shri Nanoo Ram, Aged About 48 Years, By
       Caste Jat, R/o Chak 4 Rtp, Ratanupra, Tehsil Sangaria,
       District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).
4.     Banwari Lal S/o Shri Shera Ram, Aged About 50 Years, By
       Caste Meghwal, R/o Chak 4 Rtp, Ratanupra, Tehsil
       Sangaria, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).
5.     Gutti Ram S/o Shri Ram Pratap, Aged About 38 Years, By
       Caste Jat, R/o Chak 4 Rtp, Ratanupra, Tehsil Sangaria,
       District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).
                                                                      ----Petitioners
                                     Versus
1.     State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary To The
       Government, Department Of Panchayat Raj. Secretariat,
       Jaipur.
2.     The Additional District Collector, Hanumangarh.
3.     The    Gram       Panchayat,          Ratanpura,            Tehsil     Sangaria,
       Through Its Sarpanch.
4.     The Vyavasthapak, Kriya Vikray Sahakari Samiti Limited,
       Sangaria, District Hanumangarh (Raj.).
5.     Gurmail Puri S/o Shri Sukhdeo Puri, By Caste Sadh, R/o
       Chak       4   Rtp,       Ratanupra,        Tehsil         Sangaria,     District
       Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).
                                                                    ----Respondents


For Petitioners              :     Mr. Dron Kaushik



             HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI

Judgment Order (Downloaded on 13/08/2021 at 08:59:16 PM) (2 of 2) [CW-8982/2021] 13/08/2021 Learned counsel for the petitioners have submitted that this writ petition has rendered infructuous.

Hence, the same is dismissed as having become infructuous.

(VIJAY BISHNOI),J 44-pratibha/-

(Downloaded on 13/08/2021 at 08:59:16 PM)

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)