Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 2]

Kerala High Court

M/S. Force Motors Limited Vi/445 B vs The Assistant Commissioner Of ...

Author: P.R.Ramachandra Menon

Bench: P.R.Ramachandra Menon

       

  

   

 
 
                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                             PRESENT:

                 THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON

         THURSDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2014/6TH AGRAHAYANA, 1936

                                   WP(C).No. 31610 of 2014 (A)
                                       ----------------------------

PETITIONER :
------------------------

            M/S. FORCE MOTORS LIMITED VI/445 B,
            MUNDAMPALAM, THRIKKAKARA, KOCHI-682 021


            BY ADVS.SRI.ANIL D. NAIR
                          SRI.R.SREEJITH
                          SMT.C.S.SULEKHA BEEVI
                          SMT.ROSIE ATHULYA JOSEPH
                          KUM.SOUMYA PRAKASH

RESPONDENT(S):
----------------------------

          1. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES,
               SPECIAL CIRCLE, ERNAKULAM-682 030

          2. THE COMMERCIAL TAX INSPECTOR,
              COMMERCIAL CHECK POST, BANGRA,
              MANJESHWAR-671 323


               R1 & R2 BY SR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN

            THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
            ON 27-11-2014, ALONG WITH WPC.NO. 31613/2014 AND WPC.NO. 31614/2014,
            THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:




sts

WP(C).NO.31610/2014


                              APPENDIX

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

P1    COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF REGISTRATION OF THE PETITIONER.

P2    COPY OF THE QUOTATION ISSUED BY THE PETITIONER.

P3    COPY OF THE INVOICE DATED 5/11/14 OF THE PETITIONER.

P4    COPY OF THE FORM NO.16 ACCOMPANYING THE TRANSACTION OF THE
      PETITIONER.

P5    COPY OF THE FORM AACCOMPANYING THE TRANSACTION OF THE
      PETITIONER.

P6    COPY OF THE FORM B ACCOMPANYING THE TRANSACTION OF THE
      PETITIONER.

P7    COPY OF THE FORM C OF THE AGENT ACCOMPANYING THE TRANSACTION
      OF THE PETITIONER.

P8    COPY OF THE FORM 'D' DATED 29/10/2014 ACCOMPANYING THE
      TRANSACTION OF THE PETITIONER.

P9    COPY OF THE PAN CARD AND ID CARD OF THE CUSTOMER.

P10   COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 13/11/14 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.


RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:               NIL




                                                   /TRUE COPY/


                                                   P.A.TO.JUDGE




sts



               P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J.
              ---------------------------------------
        W.P.(C) Nos.31610, 31613 & 31614 of 2014
              ---------------------------------------
         Dated this the 27th day of November, 2014.

                            JUDGMENT

The petitioner, who is same in all the three writ petitions, is aggrieved of the detention of goods brought by them (on the strength of Ext.P3), which was detained by the 2nd respondent/ Commercial Tax Inspector, issuing Ext.P10 notice under Section 47(2) of the KVAT Act doubting evasion of tax and demanding security deposit as specified therein.

2. The learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents submits on instructions and with reference to the materials on record that, because of the defects noted as per Ext.P10, the goods had to be detained in tune with the relevant provisions of law, doubting evasion of tax, and demanding security deposit. defraud the revenue, submits the learned Government Pleader.

3. After hearing both the sides, this Court finds that, this is a matter, which requires to be finalized by way of adjudication proceedings under Section 47(6) of the KVAT Act. But, for that W.P.(C) Nos.31610, 31613 & 31614of 2014 2 reason, the goods need not be detained and the same shall be released to the petitioner forthwith, on executing a 'simple bond', without sureties. This however shall be without prejudice to the rights and liberties of the second respondent/competent authority to proceed with the adjudication proceedings, which shall be finalized in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible at any rate, within 'three months' from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

The petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment, along with a copy of the writ petition, before the second respondent, for further steps.

The writ petition is disposed of.

P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE.

sp