Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Gujarat High Court

Commissioner Of Central Excise ­ vs Alidhara Textool Engineers Pvt Ltd ­ ... on 15 September, 2009

Author: K.S. Radhakrishnan

Bench: K.S.Radhakrishnan

TAXAP/1450/2009                                 1/2                                               ORDER


                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                      TAX APPEAL No. 1450 of 2009
                   With TAX APPEAL No. 1451 of 2009
                    To TAX APPEAL No. 1453 of 2009 
============================================= 
             COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE ­ Appellant(s)
                                Versus
           ALIDHARA TEXTOOL ENGINEERS PVT LTD ­ Opponent(s)
============================================= 
Appearance :
MR RM CHHAYA for Appellant(s) : 1,
None for Opponent(s) : 1,
============================================= 
    CORAM :  HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN

                  HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI

                                      Date : 15/09/2009 
                                     COMMON ORAL ORDER 

(Per : HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN) Heard learned counsel for the appellant. Admit.

Issue   notice   to   the   respondent   on   the   following   substantial  questions of law:

"(i) Whether in fact and circumstances of these cases CESTAT is right   in setting aside the demand and penalty with interest?
(ii)   Whether   in   facts   and   circumstances   of   these   cases   CESTAT   is   correct   in   holding   that   respondent   assessee   is   entitled   to   Modvat/Cenvat Credit?
(iii)  Whether   in   facts   and   circumstances  of   these   cases   CESTAT   is   right in allowing Cenvat Credit for Erection and commissioning as   Post manufacturing activity?
(iv) Whether in facts and circumstances of these cases Erection and   Commissioning falls under the category of input service as defined   under Rule 2(1) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004?"

(K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN, C.J.) (AKIL KURESHI, J.) TAXAP/1450/2009 2/2 ORDER [sn devu] pps