Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Central Information Commission

Sompal Prajapati vs Ministry Of Defence on 16 February, 2017

                   CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
                      Club Building (Near Post Office)
                    Old JNU Campus,New Delhi-110067
                      Tel: +91-11-26106140/26179548
                        Email - [email protected]

                                        File No. CIC/SS/C/2013/000581/SD
                                              Date of Decision:16/02/2017
Relevant facts emerging from the Complaint:

Complainant                  :   Sompal Prajapati
                                 90 Azad Nagar
                                 Meenakshipuram Road
                                 Meerut - 250001
Respondent                   :   1.CPIO
                                 Defence Estate Officer
                                 Meerut Circle Meerut

                                 2.CPIO
                                 HQ Sub Area
                                 Meerut Cantonment Board
                                 Meerut
RTI application filed on     :   25/02/2013
PIO replied on               :   No reply
First appeal filed on        :   N.A.
First Appellate Authority    :   N.A.
order
Complaint dated              :   02/09/2013

INFORMATION COMMISSIONER : SHRI DIVYA PRAKASH SINHA

Information sought

:

The Complainant sought information through 4 points regarding any proposal made for converting the land, near 'Khatkana Pul', Meerut Cantonment from B-4 to A-1.
Grounds for the Complaint:
The CPIO has not provided the desired information.
1
Relevant Facts emerging during Hearing: The following were present:-
Complainant: Not present.
Respondent (1): Not present.
Respondent (2): Jai Prakash, Account Clerk & APIO, Station HQ Cell, Meerut Cantt. present in person.
Respondent No. 2 submitted that despite best of his efforts, he was not able to trace the RTI Application or other reverences enclosed along with the Commission's notice.
Decision The Complainant has not availed the opportunity to appear before the Commission to plead his case. Commission upholds the submission of the Respondent No.2. No further action lies.
The Complaint is disposed of accordingly.
(Divya Prakash Sinha) Information Commissioner Authenticated true copy (H P Sen) Dy. Registrar/Designated Officer 2