Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 1]

Himachal Pradesh High Court

Ghanshyam & Another vs State Of H.P. & Others on 9 January, 2015

Bench: Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Tarlok Singh Chauhan

         IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH,
                      SHIMLA
                                       CWP No.462 of 2015
                                       Date of decision: 09.01.2015
           Ghanshyam & another                                           ..Petitioners




                                                                   .
                                Versus





           State of H.P. & others                               ..... Respondents





    Coram:

    The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Chief Justice
    The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge
    Whether approved for reporting?

    For the petitioners:

    For the respondents:
                     r             to
                                Ms. Ranjana Parmar, Advocate.

                                Mr.Shrawan Dogra, Advocate General with
                                Mr. V.S. Chauhan, Mr. Romesh Verma,
                                Additional Advocate Generals and Mr. J.K.

                                Verma, Deputy Advocate General, for the
                                respondents-State.
    ________________________________________________________________________________

    Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Chief Justice (oral)

It is contended that the petitioner moved an application under Section 156 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short, 'Cr.P.C') before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Shimla, has directed the police to do the needful, but the police has not taken any steps.

2. The petitioner is at liberty to seek appropriate remedy in terms of the mandate of Cr.P.C. before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Shimla. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Shimla to pass appropriate orders, if petition is made, in accordance with law.

3. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of alongwith all pending applications.


                                                      ( Mansoor Ahmad Mir )
                                                           Chief Justice


    January 9, 2015                                ( Tarlok Singh Chauhan )
         (vt/rkv)                                           Judge




                                                ::: Downloaded on - 15/04/2017 17:32:31 :::HCHP