Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 4]

Himachal Pradesh High Court

M/S Vaneet Khanna & Co vs State Of H.P. & Others on 11 August, 2017

Author: Sanjay Karol

Bench: Sanjay Karol

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.1830 of 2017 Date of decision: 11.08.2017 M/s Vaneet Khanna & Co. ..Petitioner .

Versus State of H.P. & others . Respondents Coram:

The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Acting Chief Justice The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner: Ms.Archana Dutt, Advocate.
r with, For the respondents: Mr.Shrawan Dogra, Advocate General, Mr.Anup Rattan, Additional Advocate General and Mr.Ramesh Thakur, Deputy Advocate General. ________________________________________________________________________________ Sanjay Karol, Acting Chief Justice (oral) Without pressing the petition on merits, learned counsel for the petitioner, under instructions, seeks permission to withdraw the present petition, reserving liberty to make a representation, venting out its grievances to respondent No.2.

2. As such, we dispose of the present petition with the following directions:

(a) It shall be open for the petitioner to approach respondent No.2, venting out all grievances, within a period of one week from today;
(b) Upon receipt of such representation, if any, the said respondent shall take decision ::: Downloaded on - 11/08/2017 23:57:14 :::HCHP 2 thereupon, positively within a period of two weeks thereafter.
(c) Needless to add, opportunity of hearing .

shall be afforded to all concerned.

(d) We are hopeful that while taking decision, the authority shall account for all attending facts and circumstances, including hardship, if any, so faced by the petitioner. Till then no coercive

(d) r to action shall be taken against the petitioner.

However, we clarify that if the petitioner does not approach the said respondent, it shall be open for the State to take action in accordance with law.

With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition stands disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any.

Copy dasti.






                                             ( Sanjay Karol )
                                          Acting Chief Justice


    August 11, 2017                        ( Ajay Mohan Goel )
        (vt)                                      Judge




                                       ::: Downloaded on - 11/08/2017 23:57:14 :::HCHP