Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Central Administrative Tribunal - Hyderabad

Ch vs K Rama Raju ---Vs.--- M/O Railways on 25 January, 2019

              CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
                     HYDERABAD BENCH
                        HYDERABAD


OA/021/930/2016                                       Dated: 25.01.2019

BETWEEN

1. Ch. V.S.K. Rama Raju,
   S/o. Ch. V. Satyanarayana Raju,
   Aged 40 years, Occ: Loco Pilot (Passenger),
   O/o the Chief Crew Controller, Kacheguda Depot,
   South Central Railway, Hyderabad Division,
   Hyderabad.

2. V.V. Ganesh Babu,
   S/o. Ranga Rao,
   Aged 34 years, Occ: Loco Pilot (Passenger),
   O/o the Chief Crew Controller, Kacheguda Depot,
   South Central Railway, Hyderabad Division,
   Hyderabad.

3. S.P. Mourya, S/o. R.R. Mourya,
   Aged 34 years, Occ: Loco Pilot (Passenger),
   O/o the Chief Crew Controller, Kacheguda Depot,
   South Central Railway, Hyderabad Division,
   Hyderabad.
                                                         ....Applicants

                                   AND

1. Union of India rep. by
   The General Manager,
   South Central Railway,
   Rail Nilayam, Secunderabad.

2. The Divisional Railway Manager (P),
   (The Senior Divisional Personnel Officer),
   South Central Railway,
   Hyderabad Division,
   Hyderabad Bhavan,
   Secunderabad.

                                                           ....Respondents


Counsel for the Applicants       : Mr. K.R.K.V. Prasad
Counsel for the Respondents      : Mr. V.V. N. Narasimham, SC for Rlys.




                                   1
 CORAM :

Hon'ble Mr. Justice R. Kantha Rao, Judl. Member
Hon'ble Mr. B.V. Sudhakar, Admn. Member


                             ORAL ORDER

(Per Hon'ble Mr. Justice R. Kantha Rao, Judl. Member) Both side learned counsel present.

2. The relief sought for in the O.A. is to conduct the examination on a single day. The same has been acceded to and the respondents are going to conduct the examination on a single day. The letter filed by the respondents to that effect is taken on record. Therefore, no cause survives for adjudication in the O.A. Hence, the O.A. is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

     (B.V. SUDHAKAR)                         (JUSTICE R. KANTHA RAO)
     ADMN. MEMBER                                  JUDL. MEMBER

pv




                                    2