Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Bombay High Court

Raja Builder vs The National Faceless Assessment ... on 13 May, 2021

Bench: K.K.Tated, Abhay Ahuja

                                               16. WPL 11224-21.odt


              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                    ORDINARY ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
                       WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 11224 OF 2021

       Raja Builders                               ..... Petitioner
            Vs.
       National Faceless Assessment
       Centre & Ors.                               .... Respondents

       Mr. Dharan V. Gandhi, Advocate for Petitioner.
       Mr. Sham Walve, AGP for State-Respondent.

                                 CORAM:     K.K.TATED &
                                            ABHAY AHUJA, JJ
                                 DATED : MAY 13, 2021
                                (VACATION COURT THROUGH VC)
       P.C.

       1.      Heard learned counsel for the parties.

       2.      Learned counsel for Petitioner submits that there
       appears to be glitches in the operation of the Faceless
       Assessment Scheme. He submits that one such instance, is
       the present petition where by show cause notice dated 20th
       April 2021, a draft assessment order had been issued to
       Petitioner requiring to show cause as to why the assessment
       should not be completed in terms of the draft assessment
       order. He submits that the said show cause appeared for the
       frst time on the E-fling portal on 22nd April 2021 and on the
       same day he fled an online reply requesting for an
       opportunity of being heard. On 23rd April 2021, he fled a
       detailed reply to the show cause notice with documentary
       evidences. However, without considering his request for
       hearing or the detailed reply, assessment order dated 23 rd
       April 2021 came to be passed, even though the time limit to

       Nikita Gadgil                                                          1/2




::: Uploaded on - 13/05/2021                 ::: Downloaded on - 13/05/2021 23:17:07 :::
                                                16. WPL 11224-21.odt


       pass the assessment order was extended to 30 th June 2021.
       He submits that in pursuance of the assessment order, there
       is a notice of demand for a sum of Rs. 17,71,87,220/- in
       addition to the penalty proceedings that have been initiated.

       4.      Mr. Sham Walve, learned counsel for the Respondents
       submits that the matter is appearing for the frst time and
       seeks time to take instructions in the matter and to fle
       affdavit-in-reply.

       5.      Having regard to the aforesaid, we pass the following
       order:
                                    ORDER

i) Pending hearing and fnal disposal of the Petition, the operation of the assessment order passed under Section 143 (3) read with Section 144B of the Act dated 23 rd April 2021 and the notice of demand in Form No. 156 dated 23rd April 2021 as well as the show cause notice under Section 274 read with Section 270A and 271AAC of the Act dated 23 rd April 2021 are stayed.

ii) Respondents to fle their reply on or before 18 th June 2021, with copy to the other side.

iii) Rejoinder, if any, to fle on or before 25th June 2021, with copy to other side.

       iv)     List the matter to 30th June 2021.



       (ABHAY AHUJA, J.)                            (K.K.TATED, J.)



       Nikita Gadgil                                                          2/2




::: Uploaded on - 13/05/2021                 ::: Downloaded on - 13/05/2021 23:17:07 :::