Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Central Information Commission

Mr.Abhay Kumar vs Insurance Division on 17 September, 2012

                   Central Information Commission
Room No.307, II Floor, B Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New 
                                Delhi­110066
           Telefax:011­26180532 & 011­26107254 website­cic.gov.in

                   Appeal: No. CIC/DS/A/2012/000365  

Appellant /Complainant        :     Shri Abhay Kumar, Palamu 
(Jharkhand)     
Public Authority              :     New India AssuranceCo. Ltd., 
Mumbay/Bhopal
                              (Dr. R.K. Duggal, CM, Sh C.K. Gola, 
DGM, Sh. S.K. Dash
                              & Sh. D.K. Gupta, CPIO/Bhopal - 
through video
                              Conferencing)  

Date of Hearing               :     17 September  2012 
Date of Decision              :     17 September 2012
  
Facts:­ 

1. Appellant   submitted  his   RTI   application   dated   24  September   2011   before   the   CPIO,   NIA   Co.   Ltd,   Bhopal   seeking  details in respect of the Court matters of MACT Surajpur/ High  Court, Bilaspur through 5 points.

2. Vide   CPIO   Reply   dated   4   October   2011,   CPIO   asked   the  Appellant to deposit RTI Application Fee within the prescribed  procedures.  

3. The   Appellant   preferred   first   Appeal   to   the   First  Appellate Authority dated 14 November 2011.

4. Vide   FAA   Order   dated   9   December   2011,   FAA   upheld   the  CPIO's  decision of dismissing  the RTI Application  on account  of   non   submissions   of   requisite   fees   as   per   the   prescribed  rules.

5. Being   aggrieved   and   not   being   satisfied   by   the   above  response   of   the   public   authority,   the   appellant   preferred  second appeal before the Commission.

6. Matter was heard today via videoconferencing.   Appellant  was present at Palamu while Respondents were present in person  at the hearing.

Appeal: No. CIC/DS/A/2012/000365       

7. Respondents   submitted   that   Appellant   is   repeatedly  submitting the RTI Application annexing Rs. 10/­ in the form  of   Cash  along   with   the   RTI   Application   which   is  against  the  prescribed rules.

8. Respondents   further   added   that   at   every   branch   of   the  Public  Authority,  the provision of submitting  the cash along  with valid Receipt is available at the Cashier counter for the  RTI   Applications   and   the   Applicant   may   avail   the   same  facility.

Decision Notice

9. After  hearing  both the parties, Commission  upholds    the  CPIO's   decision   and   dismisses   the   present   appeal   as   no   RTI  fees as prescribed in the Right to Information (Regulation of  Fee and Cost) Rules, 2005 has been paid by the RTI Applicant.  Case is closed.

(Smt. Deepak Sandhu) Information Commissioner (DS) Authenticated true copy:

(T. K. Mohapatra) Dy. Secretary & Dy. Registrar Tel. No. 011­26105027 Copy to:­
1. Shr Abhay Kumar C/o Shri Jai Naarayan Prasad  Chairman Road, Hamidganj Daltonganj, Palamu­822101 (Jharkhand)
2. The CPIO Manager New India Assurance Co. Ltd.,  Regional Office, Block No.3, 2nd. Floor  ParyawasBhawan, Arera Hills,Bhopal­462011 (MP)
3. The Appellate Authority Appeal: No. CIC/DS/A/2012/000365        Dy. General Manager  New India Assurance Co. Ltd.,  HO : New India Assurance Bldg.,  87, M.G. Road, Mumbai­400001 (Maharashtra)       Appeal: No. CIC/DS/A/2012/000365