Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi

Pratiraksha Shramik Sangh Through Its ... vs Sri Sharad Kumar Yadav, Gm, Opto ... on 13 April, 2022

                                                    OPEN COURT

                CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL,
                  ALLAHABAD BENCH, ALLAHABAD
                                  *****
                               th
                   (This the 13 Day of April, 2022)

             Hon'ble Mr. Tarun Shridhar, Member (A)
            Hon'ble Ms. Pratima K. Gupta, Member (J)

       CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 331/00014 OF 2022.
                            In
         ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 331/00909 of 2021.

   1. Pratiraksha Shramik Sangh, OPTO Electronics Factory, Raipur,
      Dehradun (Uttarakhand), through its General Secretary Avinash
      Kant, aged about 58 years, S/o Shrikant Sharma, posted as
      MCM (Personal No. 500291) R/o 53/11-4, Rajpur Road,
      Dehradun 248001.
   2. Anil Kumar, aged about 54 years, S/o Late Bali Ram, Posted as
      MCM (Personal No. 500497) R/o Shiv Girdhar Nikunj Colony,
      Sahastradhara Road, Dehradun 248001.
                                             ................ Petitioners


By Advocate:             Shri Ashok Kumar Singh/Smt Rekha Singh

                               Versus

Shri Sharad Kumar Yadav, General Manager, Opto Electronics
Factory, Raipur Dehradun 248008.
                                  ..... ............. Respondent


By Advocate:             Shri T.C. Agarwal

                             ORDER

By Hon'ble Mr. Tarun Shridhar, Member (A) We have joined the Division Bench online through video conferencing.

Page No. 2

2. Shri Ashok Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners and Shri T.C. Agarwal, learned counsel for the respondents are present.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that order passed by the Tribunal in OA No. 331/909/2021 has been complied with and he has filed affidavit of compliance to this effect.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners testifies to the statement made by the learned counsel for the respondents and expresses satisfaction over the action taken by them for implementing the orders passed by the Tribunal in OA No. 331/909/2021.

5. In view of the categorical submission of the learned counsel for the parties, the instant contempt proceedings are closed and the notice is discharged.

      (Pratima K.Gupta)                                (Tarun Shridhar)
      Member (J)                                          Member-A



Manish/-