Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 5, Cited by 0]

Central Information Commission

Mr.Rajan Nirankari vs National Commission For Scheduled ... on 16 May, 2012

                         Central Information Commission
              Room No. 305, 2nd Floor, 'B' Wing, August Kranti Bhavan, 
                      Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi­110066
                     Web: www.cic.gov.in Tel No: 26167931

                                                 Case No. CIC/SS/A/2012/000656
                                                                Dated 16.5.2012

Name of Appellant           :      Mr. Ranjan Nirankari

Name of Respondent          :      National Commission for Scheduled Castes


                                      ORDER

The Commission has received an appeal dated 7.12.2011 from Mr. Ranjan Nirankari against National Commission for Scheduled Castes for deemed refusal to his RTI request dated 30.8.2011 and first appeal dated 12.10.2011.

2. In order to avoid multiple proceedings under sections 19 and 18 of the RTI Act, viz., appeals and complaints, this case is remitted to CPIO, National Commission for Scheduled Castes, New Delhi (along with copy of complaint and RTI-request), with the following directions:

(i) In case no reply has been given by CPIO to the Appellant to his RTI-request dated 30.8.2011, CPIO should furnish a reply to the Appellant within two weeks of receipt of this order.
(ii) In case CPIO has already given a reply to the Appellant in the matter, he should furnish a copy of his reply to the Appellant within one week of receipt of this order.
(iii) CPIO should invariably indicate to the Appellant the name and address of the 1st Appellate Authority, before whom the Appellant can file first-appeal, if any.

3. In case the Appellant is not satisfied with the reply received from CPIO, he, under section 19(1) of the RTI Act, may within the time prescribed, file his first-appeal before the Appellate Authority (AA).

4. On receipt of the first appeal from the petitioner as per the above directions, AA should dispose of the appeal within the period stipulated in the RTI Act.

Case No. CIC/SS/A/2012/000656

5. In case the Appellant is not satisfied with the decision of First Appellate Authority, he is at liberty to file a second appeal afresh before the Commission, under section 19(3), along with complaint u/s 18, if any.

The appeal/complaint is disposed of with above directions.

(Sushma Singh) Information Commissioner Authenticated true copy:

(D.C. Singh) Dy. Registrar Copy to:
1. Mr. Ranjan Nirankari,  100/26, Nirankar Colony, Delhi - 110009.
2. The C.P.I.O.

National Commission for Scheduled Castes, 5th Floor, Lok Nayak Bhawan, Khan Market, New Delhi - 110003.

3. The F.A.A., National Commission for Scheduled Castes, 5th Floor, Lok Nayak Bhawan, Khan Market, New Delhi - 110003.