Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Suo Motu vs Morris Samuel Christian & on 5 November, 2015

Bench: S.R.Brahmbhatt, R.P.Dholaria

                  R/CR.MA/20917/2015                                                ORDER




                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

            CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR CONTEMPT OF COURT)
                               NO. 20917 of 2015
                                      In
                 SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.  6027 of 2015
                                     With
                CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 20920 of 2015
                                      In
                  SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6029 of 2015
                                     With
                CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 20922 of 2015
                                      In
                  SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8052 of 2015
                                      TO
                CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 20923 of 2015
                                      In
                 SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13283 of 2015
         ======================================
                             SUO MOTU....Applicant
                                    Versus
                 MORRIS SAMUEL CHRISTIAN  &  1....Respondents
         ======================================
         Appearance:
         SUO MOTU for the Applicant
         MR.MAULIK R PATEL, ADVOCATE for the Respondent Nos. 1 ­ 2
         ======================================

                   CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.R.BRAHMBHATT
                          and
                          HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.P.DHOLARIA
          
                                        Date : 05/11/2015
          
                                       COMMON ORAL ORDER

(PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.R.BRAHMBHATT) The record indicates that on account of the requirement of  segregating   the   papers,   the   notices   were   processed   and   issued   and  physically sent for service  only after  30th  October  2015 and therefore  endorsement of the board is "Notice is not received back".  We are of the  Page 1 of 2 HC-NIC Page 1 of 2 Created On Sat Nov 07 02:18:26 IST 2015 R/CR.MA/20917/2015 ORDER considered view that instead of awaiting the notice to be received back,  let   there   be   a  Fresh   Notice  in   these   proceedings   to   the  respondents/contemnor   returnable   on   30th  November   2015.     It   is  specifically   mentioned   that   in   case   if   on   30th  November   2015   the  respondents   are   not   present   before   the   Court,   the   Court   will   be  constrained to issue appropriate  process  that  may include issuance  of  bailable/non­bailable warrant for procuring their presence in this Court.

Office is directed to place copy of this order in each matter.

(S.R.BRAHMBHATT, J.)  (R.P.DHOLARIA,J.)  Rathod...

Page 2 of 2

HC-NIC Page 2 of 2 Created On Sat Nov 07 02:18:26 IST 2015