Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 2]

Karnataka High Court

Laxmi Enterprises vs Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike on 30 August, 2016

Author: L.Narayana Swamy

Bench: L. Narayana Swamy

                           1




 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU

       DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2016

                       BEFORE

     THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE L. NARAYANA SWAMY

        WRIT PETITION NO.44466/2016 (LB BMP)

BETWEEN:

LAXMI ENTERPRISES
NO.38/3, LALBAGH ROAD
BANGALORE - 560 027
(REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER
MR.VIREN R.MEHTA).                     ...PETITIONER

(BY SRI.ARUN PONNAPPA, ADV.)

AND:

1.     BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE
       HEAD OFFICE
       N.R.SQUARE
       BANGALORE - 560 002.
       (REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER).

2.     THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
       BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE
       KEMPEGOWDANAGAR SUB-DIVISION
       J.C.ROAD
       BANGALORE - 560 002.          ...RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI.K.N.PUTTE GOWDA, ADV., )

    THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 &
227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO
QUASH/SET ASIDE THE THREATENDED ACTION BY THE
RESPONDENTS IN THE IMPUGNED NOTICE ANNEXURE-M
                               2




DATED; 06.11.2015 UNDER SECTION 322(1) OF THE KMC ACT
1976, ISSUED BY TEHR -2 ALLOW THE WP, etc.

    THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY
HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

                          ORDER

Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking for dismissal of the petition as not pressed.

Memo is taken on record. In terms of the memo, petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

JUDGE sd