Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Lokinder Singh And Ors vs State Of Haryana And Anr on 27 April, 2018

Author: G.S. Sandhawalia

Bench: G.S. Sandhawalia

         IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
                        AT CHANDIGARH

                                           RFA No.3798 of 2013
                                           Reserved on: 08.03.2018
                                           Decided on: 27.04.2018
Lokinder Singh and others
                                                                ....Appellants
                                      Versus
State of Haryana and another
                                      ..Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.S. SANDHAWALIA

Present:       Mr. M.K. Chouhan, Advocate and
               Mr. Shoaib Khan, Advocate for the appellants.

               Mr. Sudeep Mahajan, Addl. AG, Haryana &
               Ms. Safia Gupta, AAG, Haryana.

G.S. Sandhawalia, J.

In view of the detailed reasons given in the order of even date passed in RFA No.3788 of 2013 'Purujit Singh Vs. State of Haryana and another', the appeals of landowners of villages Devi Nagar and Bana Madanpur are allowed and landowners of land situated in village Devi Nagar being closer to the Center of Panchkula town and more importantly closer to the more important National Highway No.22 are entitled for 20% benefit over and above `746 per square yard which had been awarded and the market value of the land is accordingly assessed @ `895 per square yard (`43,31,800/- per acre) for the said village.

Similarly, the land falling in village Bana Madanpur which is abutting the National Highway No.73 is granted 10% benefit, which takes it value to `820/- per square yard (`39,71,704/- per acre).

The appeals of landowners of village Jhuriwala, their land being sandwiched and away from the highway and having been acquired for the purposes of the road between the sectors and not a contiguous plot are, accordingly, dismissed.


                                                (G.S. SANDHAWALIA)
APRIL 27, 2018                                         JUDGE
Naveen
         Whether speaking/reasoned:                    Yes/No
         Whether Reportable:                           Yes/No



                                 1 of 1
             ::: Downloaded on - 06-05-2018 12:37:17 :::