Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Smt Thyamuddamma vs Smt Puttamma on 25 November, 2014

Author: Dilip B.Bhosale

Bench: Dilip B Bhosale

                            1


        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE

           DATED THIS THE 25th DAY OF NOVEMBER 2014

                          BEFORE

          THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DILIP B BHOSALE

                  W.P.NO.363/2012 (GM-CPC)

BETWEEN

1.    SMT THYAMUDDAMMA
      D/O LATE SMT DODDAKKA
      AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS
      W/O SRI NARASIMHA MURTHY
      R/O BARAKA VILLAGE
      C N DURGA HOBLI, KORATAGERE TQ
      TUMUR DIST

2.    SMT SUMITHRAMMA
      D/O LATE SMT DODDAKKA
      AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS

3.    SMT PUTTATHAYAMMA
      D/O LATE SMT DODDAKKA
      AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS

      PETITIONERS 2 & 3 ARE
      R/O NAVILUKURIKE VILLAGE
      C N DURGA HOBLI, KORATAGERE TALUK
      TUMKUR DIST                       ... PETITIONERS

(BY SRI G B NANDISH       GOWDA,   ADV.,   FOR   SRI   R   B
SADASHIVAPPA, ADV.,)

AND

1.    SMT PUTTAMMA
      W/O SRI KEMPANNA
      AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS
      R/O VIKKIDI VILLAGE
      BELLAVI HOBLI, TUMKUR TQ & DIST
                              2


2.    SRI NARASARAJU
      S/O LATE SMT DODDAKKA
      AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS

3.    SRI SRINIVASA MURTHY
      S/O LATE SMT DODDAKKA
      AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS

      RESPONDENTS 2 & 3 ARE

R/O NAVILUKURIKE VILLAGE C N DURGA HOBLI KORATAGERE TALUK TUMKUR DIST

4. SMT RANGAMMA W/O SRI VENKATARAMAIAH AGED AOUBT 70 YEARS R/O ANCHIMARANAHALLI C N DURGA HOBLI, KORATAGERE TALUK TUMKUR DIST ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI V B SIDDARAMAIAH, ADV., FOR R4) THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DTD.10.10.11, PASSED BY THE PRESIDING OFFICER, FAST TRACK COURT-V, MADHUGIRI ON I.A.NO.8 IN R.A. NO.262/2004 VIDE ANNEX-G AND ETC., THIS W.P. COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

PC:
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that respondent No.1 who is the only contesting respondent in the present writ petition, has died in April 2014 and so far 3 he has not received any instructions to bring his legal representatives on record.
In view thereof, the writ petition is dismissed as abated.
Sd/-
JUDGE Ia