Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 5, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

S.Pandiaraj vs The State Transport Authority on 21 December, 2020

Author: P.D. Audikesavalu

Bench: P.D. Audikesavalu

                                                                                 W.P. No. 19423 of 2016

                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                     DATED : 21.12.2020

                                                          CORAM

                                   THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.D. AUDIKESAVALU

                                                  W.P. No. 19423 of 2016
                                                           and
                                                 W.M.P. No. 16839 of 2016

                S.Pandiaraj                                                             ... Petitioner

                                                            -vs-

                The State Transport Authority,
                Chepauk,
                Chennai – 600 005.                                                    ... Respondent

                Prayer:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India

                praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondent and his

                subordinates to receive the motor vehicle tax in advance to the State of Tamil

                Nadu for 7 days / 30 days / entire quarter as and when voluntarily tendered by

                the Petitioner for using the vehicle bearing registration No. PY 01 CL 3676 to

                ply in Tamil Nadu roads without obstruction.


                                    For Petitioner    :     Mr. T.Padmanabhan

                                    For Respondent    :     Mrs. A.B.Reehana Begum,
                                                            Government Advocate



https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                1/5
                                                                               W.P. No. 19423 of 2016



                                                   ORDER

(through video conference) Heard Mr. T.Padmanabhan, Learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner and Mrs. A.B.Reehana Begum, Learned Government Advocate appearing for the Respondent and perused the materials placed on record, apart from the pleadings of the parties.

2. It is brought to notice that the Division Bench of this Court in Pondicherry Contract Carriage Owners' Association -vs- State of Tamil Nadu [(2016) 4 MLJ 237] has declared the expression 'per entry' appearing along with the rate of tax indicated in the second column of the Ninth Schedule to the Tamil Nadu Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1974 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act' for short), as against clause (c) therein covering contract carriages of omni buses as ultra vires and unconstitutional. The relevant statutory provision, for the sake of immediate reference, is extracted below:-

                           “                   NINTH SCHEDULE
                                              (See sections 3 and 6)

Contract carriages in respect of which temporary licence is issued:-

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ 2/5 W.P. No. 19423 of 2016 ....
(c) Omni bus including sleeper coach in respect of which permit is granted under sub-section (8) or (9) of section 88 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988:-
Rs. 600.00 per If the temporary licence is for the
(i) seat or berth per period not exceeding 7 days;

entry.

If the temporary licence is for a period Rs. 1500.00 per

(ii) exceeding 7 days but not exceeding 30 seat of berth per days; entry.

If the temporary licence is for a Rs. 3500.00 per

(iii) period exceeding 30 days but not seat or berth per exceeding 90 days; entry.

The Petitioner, who owns omni bus bearing Registration No. PY 01 CL 3676 (hereinafter referred to as 'omni bus' for short) which is stated to be operated as a contract carriage in the State of Tamil Nadu, has filed this Writ Petition for directing the Respondent to receive motor vehicle tax for the said omni bus as and when voluntarily tendered by the Petitioner in advance for the period of a week or a month or a quarter depending on the validity of the permit.

3. It would necessarily follow as a natural consequence of the aforesaid authoritative pronouncement which holds the field that once the Petitioner has remitted the entire amount of tax due for the specified period and holds valid https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ 3/5 W.P. No. 19423 of 2016 permit, the Respondent cannot require the Petitioner to pay further amount as tax for every entry of the said omni bus into the State of Tamil Nadu till the end of that period, and there shall be an order of restraint against the Respondent in that regard.

In the result, the Writ Petition is ordered on the aforesaid terms. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No costs.

21.12.2020 7/7 vjt Index: Yes/No Note: Issue order copy by 28.12.2020.

To The State Transport Authority, Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ 4/5 W.P. No. 19423 of 2016 P.D. AUDIKESAVALU, J.

vjt W.P. No. 19423 of 2016 21.12.2020 7/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ 5/5