Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 6, Cited by 6]

Patna High Court - Orders

Shashibhushan Kumar Singh @ ... vs State Of Bihar & Anr on 29 October, 2018

Author: Sudhir Singh

Bench: Sudhir Singh

                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                  Criminal Miscellaneous No.65436 of 2018
                   Arising Out of PS.Case No. -3275 Year- 2017 Thana -VAISALI COM PLAINT CASE District-
                                                     VAISHALI(HAJIPUR)
                 ======================================================
                 1. Shashibhushan Kumar Singh @ Shashibhushan Singh, S/o Late
                     Chandeshwar Singh, &
                 2. Induwala Sinha @ Indduwala W/o Shashi Bhushan Kumar Singh @
                     Shashi Bhushan Singh
                     Both residents of Village-Kalapahar, P.S. Jandaha, District-Vaishali
                                                                         .... .... Petitioner/s
                                                    Versus
                 State of Bihar & Anr
                                                                    .... .... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     : Mr. Manish Chandra Gandhi
                 For the Opposite Party/s     : Mr. Aditya Narayan Singh 1
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH
                 ORAL ORDER

2   29-10-2018

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, O.P. No. 2 and learned APP for the State.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 323, 379, 498A of the Indian Penal Code and ¾ of Dowry Prohibition Act.

Allegation against the petitioners is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioners. The petitioners have falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The Patna High Court Cr.M isc. No.65436 of 2018 (2) dt.29-10-2018 Page 2 of 2 petitioners have relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.

On behalf of the State and O.P. No. 2, it is submitted that the petitioners are named in the Complaint Case/F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-XV, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Complaint Case No. 3275 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

If so advised, either of the parties will be at liberty to make an application before the Court below for referring the matter to the District Mediation Centre for the purpose of reconciliation or one time settlement.

(Sudhir Singh, J) A.K.V./-

  U           T