Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 1]

Gujarat High Court

Gujarat Insecticides Ltd vs Asst. Commissioner Of on 12 February, 2013

Author: Akil Kureshi

Bench: Akil Kureshi

  
	 
	 GUJARAT INSECTICIDES LTD....Appellant(s)V/SASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX....Opponent(s)
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	

 
 


	 


	O/TAXAP/618/2012
	                                                                    
	                           ORDER

 

 


 
	  
	  
		 
			 

IN
			THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
		
	

 


 


 


TAX APPEAL  NO. 618 of
2012
 


 


 

================================================================
 


GUJARAT INSECTICIDES
LTD....Appellant(s)
 


Versus
 


ASST. COMMISSIONER OF
INCOME TAX....Opponent(s)
 

================================================================
 

Appearance:
 

MR
MANISH J SHAH, ADVOCATE for the Appellant(s) No. 1
 

================================================================
 

 


 


	 
		  
		 
		  
			 
				 

CORAM:
				
				
			
			 
				 

HONOURABLE
				MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI
			
		
		 
			 
				 

 

				
			
			 
				 

and
			
		
		 
			 
				 

 

				
			
			 
				 

HONOURABLE MS
				JUSTICE SONIA GOKANI
			
		
	

 


 

 


Date : 12/02/2013
 


 

 


ORAL ORDER

(PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI)

1. Assessee has filed appeal against the judgment of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( the Tribunal for short) dated 27.3.2012. Following questions have been raised:-

(a) Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in disallowing Rs.1,21,17,001/- paid to M/s. Gharda Chemicals Ltd. under Section 40A(2)(b) of the I.T. Act, 1961?
(b) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in disallowing commission of Rs.18,21,500/- paid to Nipun Finvest P. Ltd. and commission of Rs.5,00,000/- paid to VFC Industries Pvt. Ltd.?
(c) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in holding that the interest of Rs.27,00,000/- had really accrued on the inter corporate deposit with Nipun Investment Pvt. Ltd.?

2. Counsel for the appellant pointed out that Questions (a) and (c) are being considered in Tax Appeal No.1883 of 2010 whereas in the same appeal Question (b) was rejected.

In the result, Tax Appeal is admitted for consideration of Questions (a) and (c) only.

To be heard with Tax Appeal No.1883 of 2010.

(AKIL KURESHI, J.) (MS SONIA GOKANI, J.) SUDHIR Page 2 of 2