Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Rathesh vs State Of Kerala on 30 July, 2015

Author: K.Abraham Mathew

Bench: K.Abraham Mathew

       

  

   

 
 
                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                                      PRESENT:

                     THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW

                 THURSDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF JULY 2015/8TH SRAVANA, 1937

                                           Bail Appl.No. 1510 of 2015
                                            -----------------------------------


             CRIME NO. 142/2015 OF KONNI POLICE STATION, PATHANAMTITTA
                                                          .......

PETITIONER(S)/ACCUSED NO.2:
----------------------------------------------

            RATHESH, AGED 30 YEARS,
            S/O.SOMAN, VARUVEL HOUSE, THEKKUTHODU P.O.,
            THANNITHODU, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT.

            BY ADV. SRI.M.T.SURESHKUMAR

RESPONDENT(S)/COMPLAINANT:
------------------------------------------------

            STATE OF KERALA,
            REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA,
            ERNAKULAM - 682 031.

            BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.V.S.SREEJITH

            THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
            30-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:




msv/



                  K. ABRAHAM MATHEW, J.
            - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
                   B.A. No. 1510 of 2015
            - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
          Dated this the 30th day of July, 2015

                            O R D E R

Petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

2. Petitioner is alleged to have committed the offences under Sections 3 and 7 of Essential Commodities Act and under Section 5A of Kerala Rationing Order.

3. He is an employee of Maveli store. It is alleged that he unauthorisedly sold two bags of rice to a stranger.

3. Heard.

4. Petitioner was working as a salesman in a Maveli store. He was the custodian of the key of the store room. it was found that he sold two bags of rice unauthorisedly. The nature of the case requires his custodial interrogation. It is not proper to grant him anticipatory bail.

In the result, this application is dismissed.

sd/-

K. ABRAHAM MATHEW JUDGE R.AV //True Copy// PA to Judge