Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 4] [Section 126] [Entire Act]

Union of India - Subsection

Section 126(2) in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872

(2)any fact observed by barrister, pleader, attorney or vakil, in the course of his employment as such, showing that any crime or fraud has been committed since the commencement of his employment.It is immaterial whether the attention of such barrister, [pleader] [Inserted by Act 18 of 1872, Section 10.], attorney or vakil was or was not directed to such fact by or on behalf or his client.Explanation. - The obligation stated in this section continues after the employment has ceased.Illustrations
(a)A, a client, says to B, an attorney - "I have committed forgery and I wish you to defend me".
As the defence of a man known to be guilty is not a criminal purpose, this communication is protected from disclosure.
(b)A, a client, says to B, an attorney - "I wish to obtain possession of property by the use of a forged deed on which I request you to sue."
This communication, being made in furtherance of a criminal purpose, is not protected from disclosure.
(c)A, being charged with embezzlement, retains B, an attorney, to defend him. In the course of the proceedings, B observes that an entry has been made in A's account-book, charging A with the sum said to have been embezzled, which entry was not in the book at the commencement of his employment.
This being a fact observed by B in the course of his employment, showing that a fraud has been committed since the commencement of the proceedings, it is not protected from disclosure.