Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Jharkhand High Court

Sharad Kumar Yadav @ Sharad Yadav vs The State Of Jharkhand .... .... Opp. ... on 24 February, 2022

Author: Subhash Chand

Bench: Subhash Chand

                            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
                                     B.A. No.15328 of 2021

          Sharad Kumar Yadav @ Sharad Yadav                  ..... ... Petitioner
                                     Versus
          The State of Jharkhand                             .... .... Opp. Party
                                  --------

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHASH CHAND

------

          For the Petitioner        : Mr. Syed Tafazzul Sajid, Advocate
          For the State             : Mr. Azeemuddin, A.P.P.
                                 --------

03/24.02.2022          Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.P.P. for the
          State.

This bail application has been filed on behalf of the above named applicant with prayer to release on bail in connection with Dandai P.S. Case No.54 of 2021 (S.T. Case No.316 of 2021) under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-V, Garhwa.

Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the F.I.R. of this case was lodged by the victim herself with these allegations that on 20.04.2021 at 9 O' Clock of night she was sleeping in the courtyard of her house along with her two children, the accused Sharad Kumar Yadav intruded in her house and he committed rape upon her.

Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that as per F.I.R. allegations, the occurrence is of 20.04.2021 and the F.I.R. of the same was lodged by the victim herself on 02.07.2021. There is no cogent explanation of inordinate delay in lodging the F.I.R. The victim was major. The applicant has been languishing in jail since 18.08.2021.

Learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State vehemently opposed the contentions made by the learned counsel for the applicant and contended that victim has supported the prosecution story in her statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. So far as the delay in lodging the F.I.R. is concerned, the reason of the same was that her husband was out of station and when he came back to the house, the F.I.R. was lodged.

In view of the submissions made and materials on record, the bail application of the applicant is hereby allowed. Let the applicant be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/-(Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned in aforesaid case.

(Subhash Chand, J.) Rohit