Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 6, Cited by 0]

Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur

Amarchand S/O Kishanlal Saini vs State Of Rajasthan on 21 November, 2020

Author: Narendra Singh Dhaddha

Bench: Narendra Singh Dhaddha

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                  BENCH AT JAIPUR

   S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12103/2020

Amarchand S/o Kishanlal Saini, Aged About 60 Years, R/o Gram
Nagli, Alawada, P.s. Ramgarh, Dist. Alwar , Raj
                                                                    ----Petitioner
                                   Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
                                                                  ----Respondent

Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12453/2020 Suresh Chand S/o Amarchand, R/o Gram Nagli Alawada Ps Ramgarh Dist. Alwar Raj.

----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Inder Raj Saini (through VC) For Respondent(s) : Mr. Riyasat Ali, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA Order 21/11/2020 The present bail applications have been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in connection with FIR No.483/2020 registered at Police Station Ramgarh, District Alwar for the offence(s) under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B IPC.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners were wrongly implicated in these case. Petitioners had given money to the insurance agent for acquiring insurance policy for tractor No.RJ02-RD-2803 but he had made fake insurance policy and given to the petitioners. Petitioners had lodged an FIR (Downloaded on 23/11/2020 at 09:13:13 PM) (2 of 2) [CRLMB-12103/2020] against the Insurance agent. Petitioners did not know about fake insurance policy. So, the petitioners be enlarged on anticipatory bail.

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the applications. Allegation levelled against the petitioner-Amarchand is that he with the connivance of the other petitioner-Suresh Chand and his insurance agent had created forged insurance of the tractor No.RJ02-RD-2803 and produced the said insurance policy before the concerned court for releasing the tractor on supurdaginama.

On account of gravity of offence, I am not inclined to grant the benefit of bail to the petitioners under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

Hence, the bail applications stand dismissed. A copy of this order be placed in each connected file.

(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J Jatin /31-32 (Downloaded on 23/11/2020 at 09:13:13 PM) Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)