Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Kerala High Court

E.J.Thomas vs The Agricultural Field Officer

Author: A.Muhamed Mustaque

Bench: A.Muhamed Mustaque

        

 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                            PRESENT:

                   THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE

                 MONDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF MARCH 2016/1ST CHAITHRA, 1938

                                  WP(C).No. 10836 of 2016 (D)
                                     ----------------------------


PETITIONER(S):
-----------------------

        1. E.J.THOMAS,
           S/O.JOSEPH, ERAYAMANGALAM HOUSE,
           KURISUMOODU P.O, CHANGANASSERY.

        2. PRIYA MARY THOMAS
           D/O.THOMAS, MANNAKUNNEL THADATHIL HOUSE,
           FATHIMAPURAM, CHANGANASSERY.


                BY ADVS. SRI.SHAJI THOMAS
                           SRI.BINU PAUL
                           SRI.B.RAJESH (KOTTAYAM)

RESPONDENT(S):
--------------------------

        1. THE AGRICULTURAL FIELD OFFICER
           CONVENOR OF THE LOCAL LEVEL MONITORING COMMITTEE,
           KRISHIBHAVAN, CHANGANASSERY,
           VAZHAPPALLY WEST - 686 103.

        2. THE VILLAGE OFFICER
           MEMBER OF THE LOCAL LEVEL MONITORING COMMITTEE,
           VAZHAPPALLY EAST VILLAGE OFFICE,
           VAZHAPPALLY - 686 103.

        3. THE CHAIRMAN OF THE LOCAL LEVEL MONITORING COMMITTEE
           VAZHAPPILLY EAST VILLAGE,
           VAZHAPPALLY - 686 103.


            BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BIJU MEENATTOOR


           THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
           ON 21-03-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
           FOLLOWING:

mbr/
WP(C).No. 10836 of 2016 (D)
---------------------------------------

                                            APPENDIX

PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS:
--------------------------------------

EXHIBIT P1.          TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE VILLAGE
                     OFFICER, VAZHAPPALLY DATED 29.9.15.

EXHIBIT P2.         TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE VILLAGE
                    OFFICER, VAZHAPPALLY DATED 7.5.14.

EXHIBIT P3.         TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE
                    AGRICULTURAL FEILD OFFICER, KRISHIBHAVAN, CHENGANASSERY
                    DATED 2.3.16.

EXHIBIT P4.         TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE
                    AGRICULTURAL FEILD OFFICER, KRISHIBHAVAN, CHENGANASSERY
                    DATED 2.3.16.

EXHIBIT P5.         TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 8.3.16
                    SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONERS.

EXHIBIT P6.         TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 8.3.16
                    SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONERS.


RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:                    NIL
-----------------------------------------


                                                        //TRUE COPY//


                                                        P.S. TO JUDGE


mbr/

                    A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.
          *****************************************************************************
                          W.P.(C) No.10836 of 2016
          ******************************************************************************
               Dated this the 21st day of March, 2016

                                    JUDGMENT

The first petitioner is the owner and in possession of an extent of 13.38 ares of land in Re-survey No.16/3 of Vazhappally East Village, Cheganassery Taluk, Kottayam District. The Second petitioner is the owner and in possession of an extent of .03.91 ares of land in Re-survey No.16/3-1 of Vazhappally East Village, Cheganassery Taluk, Kottayam District. The petitioners submit that the above lands are erroneously included in the Draft Data Bank. According to the petitioners, there are paddy lands, have been converted much before the enactment of the Act 28 of 2008.

2. The petitioners have approached the Local Level Monitoring Committee by Exts.P5 and P6 to correct the entry in Draft Data Bank.

W.P.(C) No.10836 of 2016 2

3. This Court is of the view that appropriate steps shall be taken by the Local Level Monitoring Committee on Exts.P5 and P6. The Local Level Monitoring Committee shall find out whether the land in question can be classified as paddy land or nilam or wetland as on the date of the enactment of the Act 28 of 2008. If it cannot be classified either as Paddy land or nilam or wetland, necessary correction shall be carried out in the Draft Data Bank. Needful shall be done within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. It is made clear that this exercise shall be made by the Local Level Monitoring Committee if the Draft Data Bank is not finally notified.

The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs.

Sd/-

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE ln