Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Bimal Kumar Jain vs Directorate Of Enforcement on 4 January, 2022

Bench: A.M. Khanwilkar, C.T. Ravikumar

                                                     1

     ITEM NO.19                  Court 3 (Video Conferencing)              SECTION II-C

                                 S U P R E M E C O U R T O F      I N D I A
                                         RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

     Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.)                 No(s).    7942/2021

     (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 30-07-2021
     in BA No. 112/2021 passed by the High Court Of Delhi At New Delhi)

     BIMAL               KUMAR JAIN                                     Petitioner(s)

                                                    VERSUS

     DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT                                         Respondent(s)

     (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.133566/2021-EXEMPTION FROM FILING
     C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.136099/2021-EXEMPTION FROM
     FILING O.T. and IA No.133567/2021-PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST
     OF DATES and IA No.136098/2021-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL
     DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES )

     Date : 04-01-2022 This petition was called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :
                           HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR
                           HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.T. RAVIKUMAR


     For Petitioner(s)                Mr.   R Basant, Senior Adv.
                                      Mr.   Arshdeep Singh Khurana, Adv.
                                      Mr.   Shreedhar Kale, Adv.
                                      Mr.   Yash Mishra, Adv.
                                      Mr.   Pronoy Chatterjee, Adv.
                                      Ms.   Priya, Adv.
                                      Ms.   Anam Siddiqui, Adv.
                                      Ms.   Nidhi Jaswal, AOR

     For Respondent(s)                Mr    S V Raju, ASG
                                      Ms.   Sairica S Raju, Adv.
                                      Mr.   Harish Pandey, Adv.
                                      Mr.   Anil Hooda, Adv.
                                      Mr.   Bhuvan Mishra, Adv.
                                      Mr.   Shafik Ahmed, Adv.
                                      Mr.   Ajay Sharma, Adv.
                                      Ms.   Mamta Rani, Adv.
Signature Not Verified
                                      Mr.   Anuraag Tripathi, Adv.
                                      Mr.   Mukesh Kumar Maroria, AOR
Digitally signed by
NEETU KHAJURIA
Date: 2022.01.05
17:03:26 IST
Reason:




                            UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                               O R D E R

2 Heard learned counsel for the parties. We decline to interfere in this special leave petition. The special leave petition is accordingly dismissed.

However, we place on record assurance given by the Investigating Agency through Mr. S.V. Raju, learned Additional Solicitor General, that investigation will be completed expeditiously and all efforts will be made to ensure that the trial is concluded not later than end of this year 2022.

In the event, the trial does not proceed until next six months, it will be open to the petitioner to renew the prayer for bail after June, 2022. As and when trial commences, the Investigating Agency must ensure that all witnesses are made available for examination on the dates assigned by the Trial Court without fail. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.

(DEEPAK SINGH)                                    (VIDYA NEGI)
COURT MASTER (SH)                                 COURT MASTER (NSH)