Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 1]

Karnataka High Court

M/S Hajee Ebrahim Sait Wakf vs Syed Wazeer Abbas on 18 February, 2016

                           -1-
                                        CRP.No.556/2013


IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

     DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2016

                         BEFORE

        THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.G.RAMESH

        CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.556/2013

BETWEEN:

M/S. HAJEE EBRAHIM SAIT WAKF
HAVING OFFICE AT NO.47, SECOND FLOOR
GREAMS ROAD, CHENNAI - 600 006
REPRESENTED BY ITS MUTHAVALLI
M.FUAAD MUSVEE, AGED MAJOR
S/O LATE M.EBRAHIM MUSVEE                  ... PETITIONER

(BY SRI M.G.JAVEED AHMED KHAN, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.     SYED WAZEER ABBAS
       S/O LATE SYED AHMED ALI
       NO.3, SALEH ARCADIA APARTMENTS
       LEONARD LANE, RICHMOND TOWN
       BANGALORE - 560 025

2.     SYED ZAHEER ABBAS
       S/O LATE SYED AHMED ALI
       NO.96, AUSTIN TOWN LAYOUT MAIN ROAD
       OPP. BDA COMPLEX
       AUSTIN TOWN, BANGALORE - 560 046

3.     SYED ALI ABBAS
       S/O LATE SYED AHMED ALI
       NO.21, CASTLE STREET
       BANGALORE - 560 025

4.     SYED GULAM ABBAS
       S/O LATE SYED AHMED ALI
       IK MAIN ROAD, ALIPUR
                           -2-
                                       CRP.No.556/2013


     VIA THONDE BAAVI POST
     GOWRIBIDANUR TALUK - 562 101

5.   SYED MOHAMMED ABBAS
     S/O LATE SYED AHMED ALI
     NO.39, VENKAT REDDY LAYOUT
     80 FEET ROAD
     KORAMANGALA 6TH BLOCK
     BANGALORE - 560 080

6.   SHAHWAR BEGUM
     D/O LATE SYED AHMED ALI
     I.K. MAIN ROAD, ALIPUR
     VIA THONDEBAAVI POST
     GOWRIBIDANUR TALUK - 562 101

7.   SHAHENSHAH BEGUM
     D/O LATE SYED AHMED ALI
     I.K.MAIN ROAD, ALIPUR
     VIA THONDEBAAVI POST
     GOWRIBIDANUR TALUK - 562 101

8.   GULNAZ BEGUM
     D/O LATE SYED AHMED ALI
     NO.6/1, 4TH CROSS
     AANEPALYA
     BANGALORE - 560 030

9.   KAWALNAWAZ BEGUM
     D/O LATE SYED AHMED ALI
     I.K.MAIN ROAD, ALIPUR
     VIA THONDEBAAVI POST
     GOWRIBIDANUR TALUK - 562 101        ...RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI NAVEED AHMED, ADVOCATE FOR R-3;
    SRI SHAIK SOUD, ADVOCATE FOR R-9;
    R-1,R-2,R-4,R-5,R-6 & R-7 SERVED;
    R-8 - SERVICE OF NOTICE HELD SUFFICIENT
    V/O DTD.28.10.14)

     THIS CRP FILED UNDER SEC.18 OF SMALL CAUSES
COURTS ACT, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 11.11.2013 PASSED
IN S.C.15470/2011 ON THE FILE OF V ADDITIONAL SMALL
CAUSES COURT AND XXIV ACMM, BANGALORE, ALLOWING
                              -3-
                                            CRP.No.556/2013


I.A.NO.XVIII AND XIX FILED U/S 36 AND 87 OF THE WAKF ACT,
1995 R/W SEC 151 OF CPC.

     THIS CRP COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE
COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

                          ORDER

H.G.RAMESH, J. (Oral):

1. Learned counsel on both sides submit that as on the date of passing of the impugned order i.e. 11.11.2013, Section 87 of the Wakf Act, 1995 ('the Act') was not in operation as it was omitted by Wakf (Amendment) Act, 2013 (Act No.27 of 2013) with effect from 1.11.2013.
2. In view of the above, the impugned order is liable to be set aside and the matter requires to be reconsidered by the trial court as the trial court has dismissed the suit as not maintainable by relying on Section 87 of the Act though Section 87 of the Act was not in force as on the date of passing of the impugned order. Accordingly, I make the following order:
(i) The impugned order dated 11.11.2013 passed in the suit in S.C.No.15470/2011 dismissing the suit as not maintainable is set aside. The matter is remitted to the trial -4- CRP.No.556/2013 court for reconsideration in accordance with law. All contentions of both the parties in the suit are kept open.
(ii) Learned counsel on both sides submit that the parties will appear before the trial court on 10 March 2016.

Their submission is placed on record. Accordingly, the trial court shall take the suit on board on 10 March 2016.

(iii) As the suit is of the year 2011, the trial court is directed to dispose of the suit expeditiously.

(iv) The revision petition stands disposed of in the above terms. In view of disposal of the revision petition, pending interlocutory applications do not survive for consideration; they stand disposed of accordingly.

(v) Registry to return the LCR to the trial court forthwith.

Revision petition disposed of.

Sd/-

JUDGE hkh