Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur
Madan Lal Meena Son Of Shri Shilyaram ... vs Smt. Aparna Arora Principal Secretary on 5 October, 2021
Author: Ashok Kumar Gaur
Bench: Ashok Kumar Gaur
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 519/2021
Madan Lal Meena Son Of Shri Shilyaram Meena, Aged About 48
Years, R/o Dhanoli, Tehsil And District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Smt. Aparna Arora Principal Secretary, Department Of
Secondary Education, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2. Shri Saurabh Swami, Director Elementary And Secondary
Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner.
3. Shri Ripusudan Singh, Joint Director Cum Deputy
Director, Secondary Education, Bharatpur Division,
Bharatpur (Raj.)
4. Shri Radheshyam Meena, District Education Officer
Secondary, District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.)
5. State Of Rajasthan Through Additional Chief Secretary,
Department Of Education, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. G.S. Gauttam, Adv.
For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR GAUR
Order
05/10/2021
This contempt petition has been filed for alleged willful
disobedience of the order dated 17.01.2018.
This Court while disposing off the writ petition had given
direction to decide the representation by reasoned and speaking
order in accordance with the law.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the order
passed by this Court has not been complied with till date.
I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
(Downloaded on 06/10/2021 at 09:26:45 PM) (2 of 2) [CCP-519/2021] This Court finds that the order was passed in the writ petition filed by the petitioner on 17.01.2018 and the contempt petition has been filed on 29.07.2021 and as such due to period of limitation prescribed for filing the contempt petition, the same cannot be entertained.
Accordingly, the contempt petition is dismissed. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that at least liberty may be granted to the petitioner to raise his grievance in appropriate legal proceedings.
This Court finds that if any other legal remedy is available to the petitioner under the law, he is always free to avail the same.
(ASHOK KUMAR GAUR),J AARZOO ARORA /19 (Downloaded on 06/10/2021 at 09:26:45 PM) Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)