Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 6]

Madras High Court

Thandavan vs Perianna on 7 August, 1890

Equivalent citations: (1891)ILR 14MAD363

JUDGMENT

1. This is a petition to revise the judgment of the Sessions Court of Coimbatore acquitting a person accused of an offence under Section 471 of the Penal Code. In cases of acquittal by a Sessions Court, the law allows an appeal on behalf of the Government and the reason for such a provision is obvious. The present is, however, the case of a private prosecutor seeking to put the Court in motion to revise an acquittal deliberately arrived at by the Sessions Judge concurring with the assessors. An appeal against an acquittal by way of revision is, in our opinion, not contemplated by the Code, and it should, we think, on public grounds, be discouraged.

2. Acting, therefore, under the discretionary power given in Section 440, Criminal Procedure Code, we decline to hear the learned Counsel who appears to support the petition, and we dismiss the application.