Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 7, Cited by 0]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Manmohan Singh vs State Of Haryana on 11 July, 2014

Author: Tejinder Singh Dhindsa

Bench: Tejinder Singh Dhindsa

              CRM No. M-15522 of 2014
                                                       1

                               IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
                                             AT CHANDIGARH

                                                      CRM No. M-15522 of 2014.
                                                      Date of Decision : 11.07.2014.


              Manmohan Singh                                ...Petitioner

                                           Versus

              State of Haryana                              ...Respondent


              CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA.

              Present:         Mr. Parminder Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.

                               Mr. Vikas Malik, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana.

                               ***

              Tejinder Singh Dhindsa, J. (Oral)

This order shall dispose of the instant petition preferred under Section 438 Cr.P.C. seeking the concession of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.1 dated 8.1.2010, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B IPC and 13(1) DPC Act, registered at Police Station SVB, Rohtak, District Rohtak.

On 16.05.2014, while issuing notice of motion, the following order was passed by this Court :-

"Heard.
Notice of motion, returnable for 11.07.2014. In the meanwhile, petitioner is directed to join investigation.
In the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on interim bail subject to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer/ Investigating Officer. The petitioner shall join investigation as and when called upon to do so and he shall remain bound by the conditions as envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C."

Learned State counsel upon instructions from Inspector Rajiv Kumar would apprise the Court that the petitioner has since joined the Kanchan 2014.07.14 10:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh CRM No. M-15522 of 2014 2 investigation. Learned State counsel has been very fair and also brings to the notice of this Court that 8 other co-accused have already been granted the concession of anticipatory bail.

Accordingly, the present petition is allowed and the order dated 16.05.2014 passed by this Court is made absolute.

Petition disposed of.

July 11, 2014. (TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA) kanchan JUDGE Kanchan 2014.07.14 10:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh