Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 6, Cited by 0]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Devender @ Chintu vs State Of Haryana on 13 February, 2017

Author: Inderjit Singh

Bench: Inderjit Singh

                                                                           207
       IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
                      CHANDIGARH


                                            CRM No.M-3845 of 2017 (O&M)
                                          Date of Decision: February 13, 2017


Devender @ Chintu
                                                                  ...Petitioner

                                      VERSUS

State of Haryana
                                                                ...Respondent


CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJIT SINGH


Present:     Mr.Rakesh Dhiman, Advocate
             for the petitioner.

                    ****

INDERJIT SINGH, J.

Petitioner has filed this petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail in case FIR No.710 dated 20.08.2016 under Sections 148, 149, 323, 307 IPC and Section 25 of the Arms Act, registered at Police Station Jhajjar, District Jhajjar.

Notice of motion.

Mr.B.S.Virk, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana has put in appearance on behalf of the respondent-State and contested the petition.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned State counsel and have gone through the record.

From the record, I find that the present petitioner is not named in the FIR. He was not specifically stated to be armed with any weapon nor any specific injury has been attributed to him.

The petitioner is in custody since 23.08.2016. He is not 1 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 10-07-2017 13:05:48 ::: CRM No.M-3845 of 2017 -2- required for custodial interrogation or investigation as he is in judicial custody. The trial of the case will take long time. No useful purpose will be served by keeping the petitioner in custody till the disposal of the case.

Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the present case, without discussing the facts in minute detail and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail subject to his furnishing personal/surety bonds in the sum of `50,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate.

February 13, 2017                                    (INDERJIT SINGH)
Vgulati                                                   JUDGE

             Whether speaking/reasoned                    Yes
             Whether reportable                           No




                               2 of 2
            ::: Downloaded on - 10-07-2017 13:05:49 :::