Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 9, Cited by 0]

Patna High Court - Orders

Chandra Narayan Jha vs The State Of Bihar on 26 September, 2022

Author: Rajiv Roy

Bench: Rajiv Roy

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37030 of 2022
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-286 Year-2021 Thana- BAHERA District- Darbhanga
                 ======================================================
                 Chandra Narayan Jha Son Of Late Surya Narayan Jha Resident Of Village-
                 Mohan Bahera, P.S.- Bahera, District- Darbhanga

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State Of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Madhusudan Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Rita Verma, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   26-09-2022

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Let the defect(s), if any, as pointed out by the office be removed within four weeks.

The petitioner is in judicial custody in connection with Session Trial No. 251 of 2022 arising out of Bahera P.S. Case No. 286 of 2021 for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 302 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per the prosecution story, it is alleged that all the accused persons armed variously became aggressor and further allegation is that Maharudha Jha gave 'khanti' blow to the father of the informant causing serious head injury and his ultimate death. The omnibus allegation against all the persons herein is of assault.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37030 of 2022(2) dt.26-09-2022 2/3 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that specific allegation is against Maharudha Jha and this petitioner is a man of 62 years only because the matter relates to title, he has been brought within the ambit of accused persons and and he is in jail since 29.11.2021 despite the fact that he has no criminal antecedent.

Per contra, learned counsel for the informant submits that title suit is pending against them in which the petitioners are aggressor and his further statement is that since the post-mortem report shows more than one injury, the allegation against the other accused persons including the petitioner herein cannot be ignored.

Be that as it may, in the FIR, specific allegation is against Maharudha Jha of assaulting with a 'khanti' on the head of the informant's father causing his death, there is no specific allegation against this petitioner, is in custody since 29.11.2021, charge-sheet stands submitted, he has no criminal antecedent, this Court is inclined to grant him the privilege of bail.

Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge, Darbhanga in connection with Session Trial No. 251 of 2022 Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37030 of 2022(2) dt.26-09-2022 3/3 arising out of Bahera P.S. Case No. 286 of 2021 subject to the following conditions:-

(i) one of the bailor should be the family member of the petitioner, who shall provide official document to show his/her bona fide;
(ii) the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the Trial court and failure to do so for two consecutive dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of his bail by the Trial court itself;
(iii) the petitioner shall in no way try to induce or promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds.

With the aforesaid observations, the bail application is allowed.




                                                    (Rajiv Roy, J)
Ravi/Ajay Singh

U      T