Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Sumathi vs Union Of India on 24 February, 2007

        

 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                       PRESENT:

                  THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE

              WEDNESDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF APRIL 2018 / 21ST CHAITHRA, 1940

                                  WP(C).No. 15365 of 2008




PETITIONER:


     SUMATHI,
     W/O.LATE T.V.PADMANABHAN,
     DEVASWOM CHIRA, S.L.PURAM P.O.,
     CHERTHALA TALUK.


        BY ADV.SRI.K.K.SATHEESH


RESPONDENT(S):


1.   UNION OF INDIA,
     REPRESENTED BY THE UNDER SECRETARY,
     MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS,
     FREEDOM FIGHTERS DIVISION, LOK NAYAK BHAVAN,
     KHAN MARKET, NEW DELHI -110 003.

2.   STATE OF KERALA,
     REPRESENTED BY THE ADDITIONAL SECRETARY,
     GENERAL ADMINISTRATION, (FFP.A) DEPARTMENT,
     THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.


        R1 BY SRI.N.NAGARESH, ASSISTANT SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA
        R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.A.C.VIDHYA


     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD
     ON 11-04-2018,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
     FOLLOWING:



sts
24/4/2018
 WP(C).No. 15365 of 2008


                                 APPENDIX


PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:


EXT.P1      COPY OF THE CHARGE SHEET IN CASE NO.P.E.10/1122 ME (CRIME
            NO.49/122 ME OF ALAPPUZHA POLICE STATION) FILED BEFORE THE
            MAGISTRATE COURT.

EXT.P2      COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE TAHSILDAR, CHERTHALA
            DATED 24/2/2007

EXT.P3      COPY OF THE ORDER NO.H4-4888/90 DATED 24/3/1990 ISSUED BY THE
            DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ALAPPUZHA

EXT.P4      COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE
            RESPONDENTS DATED 2/5/1998.

EXT.P5      COPY OF THE LETTER NO.H2-1220/98/S.R DATED 25/7/2001 ISSUED BY
            THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ALAPPUZHA

EXT.P6      COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER DATED
            27/10/2003 TO THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ALAPPUZHA

EXT.P7      COPY OF THE NARC FROM THE CJM COURT, ALAPPUZHA

EXT.P8      COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT DULY ATTESTED BY THE JFCM-II, ALAPPUZHA
            DATED 21/11/2002

EXT.P9      COPY OF THE PKC ISSUED BY SRI.H.K.CHAKRAPANI DATED 4/10/2003

EXT.P10     COPY OF THE JUDGMENT PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT IN WP(C)
            NO.36135/2003 DATED 6/12/2006

EXT.P11     COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION NO.52/CC/K/95/2003-FF/SZ DATED
            7/1/2008 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT

EXT.P12     COPY OF THE REVIEW PETITION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER DATED
            13/2/2008

EXT.P13     COPY OF THE PKC ISSUED BY SRI.T.F.YOHANNAN DATED 10/2/2007


RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:                NIL


                                            /TRUE COPY/


                                            P.S.TO JUDGE
sts
24/4/2018

                      A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.
                     .........................................
                       W.P.(C).No.15365 of 2008
                     ..........................................
                   Dated this the 11th day of April, 2018.

                               JUDGMENT

The petitioner is the widow of late T.V. Padmanabhan. According to the petitioner, late Padmanabhan had participated in the Punnappra-Vayalar Movement. To show that, the petitioner produced Ext.P1. Ext.P1 is the charge sheet in a criminal case, wherein the name of Kuravan Padmanabhan is mentioned. According to the petitioner, Kuravan Padmanabhan is her husband. He is also known as T.V. Padmanabhan as well. The petitioner relied upon a certificate issued by the Tahsildar showing that T.V. Padmanabhan and Kuravan Padmanabhan are one and the same. The petitioner's case was not recommended by the State Government. Consequentially, the Central Government also declined the claim. In the impugned order passed by the Central Government, the following reasons have been assigned for rejecting the claim.

b