Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Basavaraj Jabshetty vs Police Sub Inspector on 28 July, 2023

Author: M.Nagaprasanna

Bench: M.Nagaprasanna

                                                -1-
                                                        NC: 2023:KHC:26630
                                                        CRL.P No. 5053 of 2023




                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                           DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF JULY, 2023

                                               BEFORE
                         THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA


                            CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 5053 OF 2023


                  BETWEEN:

                  1.    BASAVARAJ JABSHETTY
                        S/O NAGAPPA JABSHETTY
                        AGE: 69 YEARS,
                        OCC: SOCIAL WORKER
                        R/O: 8-9-264/1, GURU NAGAR COLONY,
                        BIDAR - 585401

                  2.    VIJAY SINGH S/O DHARAM SINGH
                        AGE : 51 YEARS
                        OCC: EX-MLC
                        R/O: GURUNANAK COLONY, BIDAR
                        DIST: 585401

                  3.    AMRUTRAO CHIMKODE
                        S/O ZAREPPA
Digitally signed by
PADMAVATHI B K          AGE: 67 YEARS
Location: HIGH          OCC: AGRICULTURE
COURT OF                R/O: 180, CHIMKOD
KARNATAKA               DIST: BIDAR - 585402

                  4.    PANDIT CHIDRI S/O MALLAPPA CHIDRI
                        AGE: 60 YEARS
                        OCC: SOCIAL WORKER
                        R/O: 18-2-375, CHIDRI ROAD
                        NEAR AIR FORCE SCHOOL
                        RAMNAGAR COLONY
                        BIDAR - 585 403

                                                                ...PETITIONERS
                  (BY SRI. AVINASH A. UPLOANKAR, ADVOCATE)
                                -2-
                                      NC: 2023:KHC:26630
                                        CRL.P No. 5053 of 2023




AND:

    POLICE SUB-INSPECTOR
    BEHALF OF STATE
    NUTAN NAGAR POLICE STATION
    DIST: BIDAR,
    NOW REPRESENTED BY ADDL. SPP.
    HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
    AT KALABURAGI BENCH - 585107.

                                                 ...RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. MAHESH SHETTY, HCGP)

     THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO
EXERCISE THE INHERENT POWERS U/SEC. 482 CR.P.C.
EXAMINE THE RECORDS AND QUASH THE PROCEEDINGS IN
CC.NO.3500/2022 PENDING BEFORE II ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE
AND JMFC COURT AT BIDAR, FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE
U/SEC. 188 OF IPC AND SEC. 51(B) OF NATIONAL DISASTER
MANAGEMENT ACT, 2005, AGAINST THE PETITIONERS, IN THE
INTEREST OF JUSTICE.

     THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

                            ORDER

The petitioners are before this Court calling in question the proceedings in C.C.No.3500/2022, registered for offences punishable under Section 188 of IPC and Section 51(B) of National Disaster Management Act, 2005.

2. Heard Sri. Avinash A. Uploankar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Sri.Mahesh Shetty, learned -3- NC: 2023:KHC:26630 CRL.P No. 5053 of 2023 HCGP for the respondent and have perused the material on record.

3. A complaint comes to be registered on 14.06.2021 against the petitioners and others alleging offences punishable under Section 188 of IPC and Section 51(B) of National Disaster Management Act, 2005. The concerned Court in terms of its order dated 16.06.2021 takes cognizance of the offences as afore-quoted. It is taking of the cognizance of the offences so quoted the petitioners are before this Court in the subject petition.

4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that for an offence to become punishable under Section 188 of the IPC, it should be in compliance with Section 195 of the Cr.P.C.

5. The complainant in the case at hand is the Police Sub-inspector of the Jurisdictional Police and on such complaint, cognizance for offence under Section 188 of IPC could not have been taken in the teeth of Section 195 of Cr.P.C. Therefore, on this solitary ground that a complaint is registered by the Police Sub-inspector and not by the -4- NC: 2023:KHC:26630 CRL.P No. 5053 of 2023 competent Authority, who had issued certain orders that would become ingredients of Section 188 of the IPC, the allegation and the consequent taking of cognizance would tumble down.

6. For the aforesaid reasons, the following:

ORDER i. Criminal Petition is allowed.
ii. Proceedings in C.C.No.3500/2022, pending before the II Additional Civil Judge and JMFC Court at Bidar, stand quashed.
Sd/-
JUDGE KG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 28