Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Allahabad High Court

Siddharth Shanker Srivastava vs State Of U.P. And Others on 10 April, 2023

Author: Neeraj Tiwari

Bench: Neeraj Tiwari





HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
 
 

?Court No. - 2
 

 
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 30569 of 2012
 

 
Petitioner :- Siddharth Shanker Srivastava
 
Respondent :- State of U.P. and Others
 
Counsel for Petitioner :- D.K. Gupta,Dinesh Chandra Tripathi
 
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
 

 
Hon'ble Neeraj Tiwari,J.
 

It has been mentioned in the Court notice that learned counsels are requested to mark as "S" against those Writ-C cases of daily cause list, which are still surviving. Remaining Writ-C cases against which "S" has not been marked, shall be taken up at 3.30 P.M. and appropriate order shall be passed in 1st call.

Case has been called out. Counsel for petitioner is not present and also "S" has not been marked against the present case. Learned Standing Counsel is present.

However, matter is pertaining to the year 2012, therefore, I have gone through the records. It appears that by efflux of time, writ petition has become infructuous and petitioner does not want to contest the same.

Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed.

Interim order, if any, stands vacated.

However, if anything still survives, it is open for the petitioner to move recall application.

Order Date :- 10.4.2023 ADY