Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Ravindra Jadhav vs The State Of Maharashtra on 3 October, 2019

Author: Revati Mohite Dere

Bench: Revati Mohite Dere

                                                 1/5                           907-ba-359-2019.odt


Shailaja

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                   CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                           CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.359 OF 2019


           Ravindra Jadhav                                           ]        Applicant

                    Versus

           The State of Maharashtra                                    ]      Respondent

                                           .....
           Mr. Aditya Salve a/w Abbas Mookhtiar, for the Applicant.

           Ms. P.P.Shinde, A.P.P for the Respondent - State.

           API - Ganesh Kumbhar, Mahatma Phule Chowk Police Station, Kalyan.

                                                       .....

                                               CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

                                               DATE :    3rd OCTOBER, 2019

           P.C. :


           1.                 Heard learned Counsel for the parties.


           2.                 By this application, the Applicant seeks his enlargement on

           bail in connection with C.R. No.130 of 2016 registered with the Charkop

           Police        Station, Mumbai,        for the alleged offences punishable under

           Sections 370 (3), 370 (4) r/w section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and




                ::: Uploaded on - 05/10/2019                    ::: Downloaded on - 05/10/2019 20:55:05 :::
                                          2/5                           907-ba-359-2019.odt


under Sections 3,4 & 5 of the Prevention of Immoral Trafficking Act and

4,8 and 17 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act.



3.                   Perused the papers. On receipt of secret information that

prosecution activities were going on in a flat, a raid was conducted and two

girls were rescued. Out of two girls who were rescued, one was a minor

aged 17 years. During the course of investigation, statements of the rescued

girls were recorded under 164 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973. The

rescued girls aged 17 years and 22 years have not named the applicant.



4.                 Learned Counsel for the applicant has tendered an affidavit of

the applicant. The same is taken on record and marked 'X' for

identification. In the said affidavit, the applicant has undertaken not to

indulge in any similar activities and threaten any witness as well as has

undertaken to co-operate with the trial. A perusal of 164 statement of the

minor victim girl who is 17 years age shows that the applicant's wife had

taken her home for doing household work. The minor girl has alleged that

when she asked the applicant's wife for money, the applicant's wife told her

that she would have to sleep with one person. She has further stated that

applicant's wife called one person and the said person had forcible sexual

relations with her. None            of    the rescued girls have named the applicant.




     ::: Uploaded on - 05/10/2019                       ::: Downloaded on - 05/10/2019 20:55:05 :::
                                      3/5                            907-ba-359-2019.odt


The applicant has no antecedents.



5.                  The applicant is in the custody since May, 2016. Investigation

is complete and the charge-sheet is filed.


6.                  Considering the aforesaid, the application is allowed and the

applicant is enlarged on bail on the following terms and conditions:-



                                      ORDER

i) The Applicant be enlarged on bail on furnishing P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs.15,000/- with one or two local sureties in the like amount;

ii) The Applicant shall report the concerned Police Station, on the first Saturday of every month, between 10:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m., till the conclusion of the trial;

iii) The Applicant shall inform his latest place of residence and mobile contact number immediately after being released and/or change of residence or mobile details, if any, from time to time to the trial Court as well as to the concerned Police Station, in writing; ::: Uploaded on - 05/10/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 05/10/2019 20:55:05 :::

                                      4/5                             907-ba-359-2019.odt


iv)        The Applicant shall not tamper with the evidence or attempt to

influence/contact the complainant, witnesses or any person concerned with the case;

v) The Applicant shall co-operate in the conduct of the trial and shall attend the trial Court on every date of hearing, unless exempted by the trial Court;

vi) An undertaking to the aforesaid clauses (ii) to (v), shall be filed by the Applicant in the Registry of the trial Court, within two weeks of his release;

vii) If there are 2 consecutive defaults either in attending the Police Station or in appearing before the trial Court or breach of any of the conditions as stated above, the prosecution will be at liberty to apply for cancellation of Applicant's bail.

7. The Application is allowed and disposed of in above terms.

8. It is made clear, that the observations made herein are prima facie, and the trial Court shall decide the case on its own merits, in accordance with law, uninfluenced by the observations made in this order. ::: Uploaded on - 05/10/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 05/10/2019 20:55:05 :::

5/5 907-ba-359-2019.odt

9. All concerned to act on the authenticated copy of this order.

[REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.] ::: Uploaded on - 05/10/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 05/10/2019 20:55:05 :::