Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 1]

Jharkhand High Court

Ms D E W Concrete Ties Private Limited ... vs The State Of Jharkhand And Ors on 1 August, 2017

Author: D.N. Patel

Bench: D.N. Patel

       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI                                            
                   W.P. (L) No. 367 of 2013
                             With
                    I.A. No. 5894 of 2017
M/s.   D.E.W.   Concrete   Ties   Private   Limited   under   the   Companies   Act,   1956 
having   its   registered   office   at   Dobhi   Road,   Rampur,   P.S.   Rampur,   Town   & 
District­   Gaya,   in   the   State   of   Bihar   and   Works   at   Narsingarh   At   &   P.O. 
Dhalbhumgarh, District­ East Singhbhum, Jharkhand represented by its Director 
Shri Rakesh Srivastava, S/o Late S.N.P. Srivastava, resident of HIG, A­1 Madho 
Bag   Colony,   Mango,   P.S.   Azad   Nagar   Town,   Jamshedpur,   District­   East 
Singhbhum, Jharkhand                                                        ...  Petitioner
                                       ­Versus­
1.

The State of Jharkhand through the Principal Secretary to the Government  of Jharkhand Department of Labour Employment & Training, Nepal House,  P.O. & P.S. Doranda, District­ Ranchi

2. The   Deputy   Labour   Commissioner­cum­Authority   under   Section   15(2)   of  Payment   of   Wages   Act,   1936   for   Kolhan   Division   at   Jamshedpur   having  office at Sitaramdera, P.O. Agrico, P.S. Sitaramdera

3. Inspector   of   Factories   Circle­II,   Jamshedpur,   P.O.   &   P.S.   Bistupur   Town,  Jamshedpur, District­ East Singhbhum, Jharkhand

4. Shri Binay Kumar, S/o Late Jogindra Nath, Inspector of Factories Circle­II,  Jamshedpur,   P.O.   &   P.S.   Bistupur   Town,   Jamshedpur,   District­   East  Singhbhum, Jharkhand

5. Shri   Shyam   Sunder   Pathak,   Deputy   Labour   Commissioner­cum­   Authority  under Payment of Wages Act, 1936 for Kolhan Division at Jamshedpur

6. The Union of India through its Secretary, Department of Labour, New Delhi,  P.O., P.S. & District­ New Delhi  ...  Respondents WITH    W.P. (L) No. 371 of 2013 M/s. Daya Concrete Private Limited under the Companies Act, 1956 having its  registered office at Dobhi Road, Rampur, P.S. Rampur, Town & District­ Gaya, in  the State of Bihar and Works at Narsingarh At & P.O. Dhalbhumgarh, District­  East Singhbhum, Jharkhand represented by its Director Shri Rakesh Srivastava,  S/o Late S.N.P. Srivastava, resident of HIG, A­1 Madho Bag Colony, Mango, P.S.  Azad Nagar Town, Jamshedpur, District­ East Singhbhum, Jharkhand        ...  Petitioner         ­Versus­

1. The State of Jharkhand through the Principal Secretary to the Government  of Jharkhand Department of Labour Employment & Training, Nepal House,  P.O. & P.S. Doranda, District­ Ranchi

2. The   Deputy   Labour   Commissioner­cum­Authority   under   Section   15(2)   of  Payment   of   Wages   Act,   1936   for   Kolhan   Division   at   Jamshedpur   having  office at Sitaramdera, P.O. Agrico, P.S. Sitaramdera

3. Inspector   of   Factories   Circle­II,   Jamshedpur,   P.O.   &   P.S.   Bistupur   Town,  Jamshedpur, District­ East Singhbhum, Jharkhand

4. Shri Binay Kumar, S/o Late Jogindra Nath, Inspector of Factories Circle­II,  Jamshedpur,   P.O.   &   P.S.   Bistupur   Town,   Jamshedpur,   District­   East  Singhbhum, Jharkhand

5. Shri   Shyam   Sunder   Pathak,   Deputy   Labour   Commissioner­cum­   Authority  under Payment of Wages Act, 1936 for Kolhan Division at Jamshedpur

6. The Union of India through its Secretary, Department of Labour, New Delhi,  P.O., P.S. & District­ New Delhi  ...  Respondents ­­­­­­­­­        ­2­ CORAM:  HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RATNAKER BHENGRA ­­­­­­­­­ For the Petitioner         :  Absent For the Respondents   : J.C. to G.A. ­­­­­­­­­      11/  Dated: 1     August,   2017  st Oral Order Per D.N. Patel, A.C.J.:  

1. When the matter is called out, learned counsel for the petitioner is absent. 

Neither   the   matters   are   mentioned   nor   anybody   appears   on   behalf   of   the  petitioner.

2. Hence, both the writ petitions are dismissed for default.

3. I.A. No. 5894 of 2017 in W.P.(L) No. 367 of 2013 is also dismissed.

4. Interim relief, if any, stands vacated.

            (D.N. Patel, A.C.J.)                                (Ratnaker Bhengra, J.) Ajay/