Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Mukeshbhai Chhaganlal Gandhi vs Vrujeshkumar Ranjitlal Maval on 23 July, 2019

Author: R.P.Dholaria

Bench: R.P.Dholaria

         R/CR.MA/13361/2019                                           ORDER




        IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

         R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 13361 of 2019
=============================================
                 MUKESHBHAI CHHAGANLAL GANDHI
                             Versus
                 VRUJESHKUMAR RANJITLAL MAVAL
=============================================
Appearance:
MR KASHYAP R JOSHI(2133) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
for the Respondent(s) No. 1
MS.HANSA PUNANI APP(2) for the Respondent(s) No. 2
=============================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.P.DHOLARIA

                              Date : 23/07/2019
                               ORAL ORDER

[1] This is an application preferred by the applicant under section 378 (4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 for leave to appeal against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 08.01.2019 passed in Criminal Case No.347 of 2009 by learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Hansot.

[2] Rule. Ms.H.B.Punani, learned A.P.P. waives service of notice of Rule for the respondent - State.

[3] Heard learned advocate for the applicant and learned A.P.P. for the respondent - State.

[4] Considering the averments made in the application supported by the affidavit as well as arguments advanced by learned advocate for the applicant that the accused had not responded to the statutory notice and the learned trial Court has wrongly recorded the findings, leave to appeal deserves to be granted. Accordingly, this application is allowed in terms of Para 7(A). Rule is made absolute.

(R.P.DHOLARIA, J) Manoj Page 1 of 1 Downloaded on : Thu Jul 25 01:39:52 IST 2019