Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Jai Bhagwan vs S.S Phulia Deputy Commissioner ... on 27 September, 2019

Author: Avneesh Jhingan

Bench: Avneesh Jhingan

COCP No.2325 of 2018                                                ~1~
219
           IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
                      AT CHANDIGARH

                                        ****
                                          COCP No.2325 of 2018
                                          Date of Decision: 27.09.2019

Jai Bhagwan
                                                                 Petitioner
                                    Versus

Dr. S.S. Phulia, Deputy Commissioner, Kurukshetra and others

                                                             Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN

Present:   Mr. Abhimanyu Batra, Advocate for
           Mr. Raghav Sharma, Advocate
           for the petitioner.

           Mr. Sandeep S. Mann, Sr. D.A.G., Haryana.

           Mr. Gaurav Jaglan, Advocate for
           Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate
           for respondent No.4.

           Mr. Vishwajeet, Advocate
           for respondents No.5 to 13.

                                        ****

AVNEESH JHINGAN, J (Oral):

The present contempt petition has been filed pleading wilful disobedience of order dated 29.05.2018 passed by this Court in CM No.8157-CWP of 2018 in/and CWP No.120 of 2018. It was ordered that no construction shall be permitted to take place till the next date of hearing.

Learned counsel(s) for the respondents state that after granting interim directions, matter was adjourned for 07.08.2018 and 1 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 02-10-2019 08:41:13 ::: COCP No.2325 of 2018 ~2~ on that date Writ Court vacated the interim order.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is not in a position to contradict the said fact. The basis for filing the contempt petition has been eroded by vacation of interim order.

The contempt petition is dismissed. Rule issued against the respondents stands discharged.

[AVNEESH JHINGAN] JUDGE September 27, 2019 pankaj baweja

1. Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes / No

2. Whether reportable : Yes / No 2 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 02-10-2019 08:41:13 :::