Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 7]

Supreme Court of India

Balwinder Singh & Anr vs State Of Punjab & Ors on 13 June, 2008

Bench: P.P. Naolekar, Arijit Pasayat

                   IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
                  CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                              CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 829 OF 2002


         BALWINDER SINGH & ANR.                        .. APPELLANTS

                    vs.

         STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. .. RESPONDENTS

                                                    ORDER

Heard.

By dated 22nd August, 2001, a learned Single Judge of Punjab and Haryana High Court cancelled the bail granted to the appellant by another learned Single Judge of the High Court. The protection in terms of Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. was in terms of order dated 30.3.2000 of learned Single Judge.

We have heard learned counsel for the parties. As has been held by this Court in Adri Dharan Das vs. State of West Bengal [ 2005(4) SCC p.303], grant of protection under Sec.438 Cr.P.C. is not for an indefinite period. Within the time to be stipulated in the order prayer for regular bail has to be made and considered on merit. Therefore, we direct that the order dated 30.3.2000, as was originally passed by a learned Single Judge, shall be operative for a period of six weeks within which period the appellant shall seek regular bail in terms of what has been stated in aforesaid decision of this Court.

The Criminal Appeal is disposed of accordingly.

.......................J. (Dr.ARIJIT PASAYAT) ......................J. (P.P. NAOLEKAR) NEW DELHI;

JUNE 13,2008.